Pharmacy students' perceptions of a teaching evaluation process

被引:18
作者
Surratt, Christopher K. [1 ]
Desselle, Shane P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duquesne Univ, Mylan Sch Pharm, Pittsburgh, PA 15282 USA
关键词
assessment; questionnaire; survey; evaluation; teaching;
D O I
10.5688/aj710106
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective. To assess PharmD students' perceptions of the usefulness of Duquesne University's Teaching Effectiveness Questionnaire (TEQ), the instrument currently employed for student evaluation of teaching. Methods. Opinions of PharmD students regarding the TEQ were measured using a survey instrument comprised of Likert-type scales eliciting perceptions, behaviors, and self-reported biases. Results. PharmD students viewed student evaluation of teaching as appropriate and necessary, but conceded that the faculty members receiving the best evaluations were not always the most effective teachers. Most students indicated a willingness to complete the TEQ when given the opportunity but expressed frustration that their feedback did not appear to improve subsequent teaching efforts. Conclusion. The current TEQ mechanism for student evaluation of teaching is clearly useful but nevertheless imperfect with respect to its ability to improve teaching. Future research may examine other aspects of pharmacy students' roles as evaluators of teaching.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Aleamoni L.M., 1999, J PERS EVAL EDUC, V13, P153, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1008168421283
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, How to ask survey questions
[3]  
Barnett CW, 1997, AM J PHARM EDUC, V61, P345
[4]   A comparison between student ratings and faculty self-ratings of instructional effectiveness [J].
Barnett, CW ;
Matthews, HW ;
Jackson, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2003, 67 (04)
[5]   USING GLOBAL STUDENT RATING ITEMS FOR SUMMATIVE EVALUATION [J].
CASHIN, WE ;
DOWNEY, RG .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (04) :563-572
[6]  
CASHIN WE, 1995, ED402338 KANS STAT U
[7]  
CENTRA JA, 1993, REFLECTIVE FAULTY EV
[8]   Construction, implementation, and analysis of summated rating attitude scales [J].
Desselle, SP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 69 (05)
[9]  
EMERY CR, 2003, QUALITY ASSURANCE ED, V11, P37, DOI DOI 10.1108/09684880310462074