Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Pro-Environmental Behavior Task

被引:21
作者
Lange, Florian [1 ]
Dewitte, Siegfried [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Behav Engn Res Grp, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Pro-environmental behavior; Conservation (ecological behavior); Measurement; Validity; Reliability; Laboratory assessment; VALIDATION; ANONYMITY; PARADIGM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101550
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The study of pro-environmental behavior has been dominated by self-report scales and field observations. Although both approaches have their merits, they also suffer from critical limitations that obstruct progress towards a better understanding of pro-environmental behavior. The Pro-Environmental Behavior Task (PEBT) was developed to address these limitations by facilitating the study of actual pro-environmental behavior under controlled laboratory conditions. In the present research, we examined whether the PEBT can also provide a valid and reliable indicator of people's propensity to show pro-environmental behavior. In support of the task's test-retest reliability, we found PEBT choice behavior to be strongly correlated across a period of approximately one month (r = 0.81). In addition, PEBT performance was significantly correlated to both objective observations and subjective reports of other pro-environmental behaviors. Our results further suggest participants' PEBT choices to be most closely related to individual differences in transportation behavior. These findings indicate that the PEBT might prove useful not only as a procedure for the experimental study of pro-environmental behavior, but also for the performance-based assessment of a person's propensity to engage in pro environmental behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica [J].
Alpizar, Francisco ;
Carlsson, Fredrik ;
Johansson-Stenman, Olof .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2008, 92 (5-6) :1047-1060
[2]   Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: An Experimental Test of Pro-Environmental Spillover From Reducing Meat Consumption to Monetary Donations [J].
Carrico, Amanda R. ;
Raimi, Kaitlin T. ;
Truelove, Heather Barnes ;
Eby, Brianne .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2018, 50 (07) :723-748
[3]   How to do a meta-analysis [J].
Field, Andy P. ;
Gillett, Raphael .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (03) :665-694
[4]   Environmental Psychology Matters [J].
Gifford, Robert .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 65, 2014, 65 :541-579
[5]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560
[6]   Assessing people's general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural measure [J].
Kaiser, FG ;
Wilson, M .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 30 (05) :952-978
[7]   General measure of ecological behavior [J].
Kaiser, FG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 28 (05) :395-422
[8]   How do we know we are measuring environmental attitude? Specific objectivity as the formal validation criterion for measures of latent attributes [J].
Kaiser, Florian G. ;
Merten, Martin ;
Wetzel, Eunike .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 55 :139-146
[9]   Reviving Campbell's Paradigm for Attitude Research [J].
Kaiser, Florian G. ;
Byrka, Katarzyna ;
Hartig, Terry .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 14 (04) :351-367
[10]   Which is the greater good? A social dilemma paradigm disentangling environmentalism and cooperation [J].
Klein, Sina A. ;
Hilbig, Benjamin E. ;
Heck, Daniel W. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 53 :40-49