Comparison of sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes

BackgroundEstimation of fetal weight (EFW) by ultrasound is useful in clinical decision-making. Numerous formulas for EFW have been published but have not been validated in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of EFW formulas in patients with PPROM, and to further evaluate the performance of the most commonly used formula - Hadlock IV.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of women with singleton gestations and PPROM, admitted to a single tertiary center between 2005 and 2017 from 22(0/7)-33(0/7) (n=565). All women had an EFW within 14days of delivery by standard biometry (biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length). The accuracy of previously published 21 estimated EFW formulas was assessed by comparing the Pearson correlation with actual birth weight, and calculating the random error, systematic error, proportion of estimates within 10% of birth weight, and Euclidean distance.ResultsThe mean gestational was 26.82.4weeks at admission, and 28.2 +/- 2.6weeks at delivery. Most formulas were strongly correlated with actual birth weight (r>0.9 for 19/21 formulas). Mean systematic error was -4.30% and mean random error was 14.5%. The highest performing formula, by the highest proportion of estimates and lowest Euclidean distance was Ott (1986), which uses abdominal and head circumferences, and femur length. However, there were minimal difference with all of the first 10 ranking formulas. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the Hadlock IV formula was strong at r=0.935 (p<0.001), with 319 (56.5%) of measurements falling within 10%, 408 (72.2%) within 15% and 455 (80.5%) within 20% of actual birth weight. This correlation was unaffected by gender (r=0.936 for males, r=0.932 for females, p<0.001 for both) or by amniotic fluid level (r=0.935 for mean vertical pocket <2cm, r=0.943 for mean vertical pocket <greater than or equal to>2cm, p<0.001 for both).Conclusions In women with singleton gestation and PPROM, the Ott (1986) formula for EFW was the most accurate, yet all of the top ten ranking formulas performed quite well. The commonly used Hadlock IV performed quite similarly to Ott's formula, and is acceptable to use in this specific setting.