Distribution of CORE-OM scores in a general population, clinical cut-off points and comparison with the CIS-R

被引:156
作者
Connell, Janice
Barkham, Michael
Stiles, William B.
Twigg, Elspeth
Singleton, Nicola
Evans, Olga
Miles, Jeremy N. V.
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Psychol Therapies Res Ctr, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Miami Univ, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[3] Off Natl Stat, London, England
[4] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1192/bjp.bp.105.017657
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Although measures of psychopathology are designed for use in clinical populations, their meaning derives from comparison with normal populations. Aims To compare the distribution of scores on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) from a general population sample with the distribution in an aggregated clinical sample to derive recommended cut-off points for determining clinical significance. Method The CORE-OM general population sample was based on a weighted subsample of participants in the psychiatric morbidity follow-up survey who completed valid CORE-OM forms following their interview (effective n=535). Results Comparison of the CORE-OM general population sample with a clinical sample aggregated from previous studies (n=10761) yielded a cut-off score of 9.9 on the 0-40 scale of the CORE-OM. The CORE-OM was highly correlated (r=0.77) with the Clinical Interview Schedule - Revised, supporting convergent validity. Conclusions We recommend rounding the CORE-OM cut-off score to 10. However, cut-off scores must be used thoughtfully and adjusted to fit context and purpose. Declaration of interest M.B. was funded by the Mental Health Foundation to develop the CORF-OM.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 74
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, PSYCHIAT MORBIDITY A
[2]   Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings [J].
Barkham, M ;
Gilbert, N ;
Connell, J ;
Marshall, C ;
Twigg, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 186 :239-246
[3]   Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies [J].
Barkham, M ;
Margison, F ;
Leach, C ;
Lucock, M ;
Mellor-Clark, J ;
Evans, C ;
Benson, L ;
Connell, J ;
Audin, K ;
McGrath, G .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 69 (02) :184-196
[4]   PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY - 25 YEARS OF EVALUATION [J].
BECK, AT ;
STEER, RA ;
GARBIN, MG .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1988, 8 (01) :77-100
[5]   Convergent validity of the CORE measures with measures of depression for clients in cognitive therapy for depression [J].
Cahill, J ;
Barkham, M ;
Stiles, WB ;
Twigg, E ;
Hardy, GE ;
Rees, A ;
Evans, C .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 53 (02) :253-259
[6]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[7]   Practice-based evidence: Benchmarking NHS primary care counselling services at national and local levels [J].
Evans, C ;
Connell, J ;
Barkham, M ;
Marshall, C ;
Mellor-Clark, J .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2003, 10 (06) :374-388
[8]   Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM [J].
Evans, C ;
Connell, J ;
Barkham, M ;
Margison, F ;
McGrath, G ;
Mellor-Clark, J ;
Audin, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 180 :51-60
[9]   CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE - A STATISTICAL APPROACH TO DEFINING MEANINGFUL CHANGE IN PSYCHOTHERAPY-RESEARCH [J].
JACOBSON, NS ;
TRUAX, P .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 59 (01) :12-19
[10]   Transforming between Beck Depression Inventory and CORE-OM scores in routine clinical practice [J].
Leach, C ;
Lucock, M ;
Barkham, M ;
Stiles, WB ;
Noble, R ;
Iveson, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 45 :153-166