Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme

被引:308
作者
Walters, Stephen J. [1 ]
Henriques-Cadby, Ines Bonacho Dos Anjos [1 ]
Bortolami, Oscar [1 ]
Flight, Laura [1 ]
Hind, Daniel [1 ]
Jacques, Richard M. [1 ]
Knox, Christopher [1 ]
Nadin, Ben [1 ]
Rothwell, Joanne [1 ]
Surtees, Michael [1 ]
Julious, Steven A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; CONSORT STATEMENT; MULTICENTER; PROFESSIONALS; PREVENTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015276
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Substantial amounts of public funds are invested in health research worldwide. Publicly funded randomised controlled trials (RCTs) often recruit participants at a slower than anticipated rate. Many trials fail to reach their planned sample size within the envisaged trial timescale and trial funding envelope. Objectives: To review the consent, recruitment and retention rates for single and multicentre randomised control trials funded and published by the UK's National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme. Data sources and study selection: HTA reports of individually randomised single or multicentre RCTs published from the start of 2004 to the end of April 2016 were reviewed. Data extraction: Information was extracted, relating to the trial characteristics, sample size, recruitment and retention by two independent reviewers. Main outcome measures: Target sample size and whether it was achieved; recruitment rates (number of participants recruited per centre per month) and retention rates (randomised participants retained and assessed with valid primary outcome data). Results: This review identified 151 individually RCTs from 787 NIHR HTA reports. The final recruitment target sample size was achieved in 56% (85/151) of the RCTs and more than 80% of the final target sample size was achieved for 79% of the RCTs (119/ 151). The median recruitment rate (participants per centre per month) was found to be 0.92 (IQR 0.432.79) and the median retention rate (proportion of participants with valid primary outcome data at followup) was estimated at 89% (IQR 79-97%). Conclusions: There is considerable variation in the consent, recruitment and retention rates in publicly funded RCTs. Investigators should bear this in mind at the planning stage of their study and not be overly optimistic about their recruitment projections.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [11] A rapid review indicated higher recruitment rates in treatment trials than in prevention trials
    Cooper, Cindy L.
    Hind, Daniel
    Duncan, Rosie
    Walters, Stephen
    Lartey, Adjoa
    Lee, Ellen
    Bradburn, Mike
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (03) : 347 - 354
  • [12] A WILCOXON-TYPE TEST FOR TREND
    CUZICK, J
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1985, 4 (01) : 87 - 90
  • [13] Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials
    Edwards, SJL
    Braunholtz, DA
    Lilford, RJ
    Stevens, AJ
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7195): : 1407 - 1409
  • [14] The RATPAC (Randomised Assessment of Treatment using Panel Assay of Cardiac markers) trial: a randomised controlled trial of point-of-care cardiac markers in the emergency department Introduction
    Goodacre, S.
    Bradburn, M.
    Fitzgerald, P.
    Cross, E.
    Collinson, P.
    Gray, A.
    Hall, A. S.
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2011, 15 (23) : 1 - +
  • [15] Kalra L, 2005, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V9, P1
  • [16] King M, 2005, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V9, P1
  • [17] ARTISTIC: a randomised trial of-human-papillomavirus (HPV) testing in primary cervical screening
    Kitchener, H. C.
    Almonte, M.
    Gilham, C.
    Dowie, R.
    Stoykova, B.
    Sargent, A.
    Roberts, C.
    Desai, M.
    Peto, J.
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2009, 13 (51) : 1 - +
  • [18] What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies
    McDonald, Alison M.
    Knight, Rosemary C.
    Campbell, Marion K.
    Entwistle, Vikki A.
    Grant, Adrian M.
    Cook, Jonathan A.
    Elbourne, Diana R.
    Francis, David
    Garcia, Jo
    Roberts, Ian
    Snowdon, Claire
    [J]. TRIALS, 2006, 7 (1)
  • [19] The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials
    Moher, D
    Schulz, KF
    Altman, DG
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) : 657 - 662
  • [20] Pickard R, 2012, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V16, P1, DOI [10.3310/jta16470, 10.3310/hta16470]