Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in perforated appendicitis

被引:47
作者
Fukami, Yasuyuki [1 ]
Hasegawa, Hiroshi [1 ]
Sakamoto, Eiji [1 ]
Komatsu, Shunichiro [1 ]
Hiromatsu, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hosp, Dept Surg, Nagoya, Aichi 4668650, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00268-006-0065-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with perforated appendicitis. Methods: This study involved a total of 73 consecutive patients who had undergone appendectomy for perforated appendicitis between January 1999 and December 2004. While 39 patients underwent open appendectomy (OA) during the first 3 years, the remaining 34 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) during the last 3 years. Results: There was no case of LA converted to OA. No significant difference was found in the operating time between the two groups. Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with less analgesic use, earlier oral intake restart (LA, 2.6 days; OA, 5.1 days), shorter median hospital stay (LA, 11.7 days; OA, 25.8 days), and lower rate of wound infections (LA, 8.8%; OA, 43.6%). Conclusions: These results suggest that LA for perforated appendicitis is a safe procedure that may prove to have significant clinical advantages over conventional surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 97
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] APELGREN KN, 1995, AM SURGEON, V61, P240
  • [2] BONANNI F, 1994, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V179, P273
  • [3] A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy
    Chung, RS
    Rowland, DY
    Li, P
    Diaz, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (03) : 250 - 256
  • [4] Frazee RC, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P509
  • [5] Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy
    Garbutt, JM
    Soper, NJ
    Shannon, WD
    Botero, A
    Littenberg, B
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 9 (01) : 17 - 26
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis
    Golub, R
    Siddiqui, F
    Pohl, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (05) : 545 - 553
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy - Outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database
    Guller, U
    Hervey, S
    Purves, H
    Muhlbaier, LH
    Peterson, ED
    Eubanks, S
    Pietrobon, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 239 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [8] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Prospective randomized trial
    Hansen, JB
    Smithers, BM
    Schache, D
    Wall, DR
    Miller, BJ
    Menzies, BL
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 20 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [9] Primary versus delayed wound closure in complicated appendicitis: an international systematic review and meta-analysis
    Henry, MCW
    Moss, RL
    [J]. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 21 (08) : 625 - 630
  • [10] Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis
    Johnson, AB
    Peetz, ME
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (07): : 940 - 943