Moist- and dry-season nitrogen transport in Sierra Nevada soils

被引:6
作者
Burcar, S
Miller, WW
Tyler, SW
Blank, RR
机构
[1] UNIV NEVADA, DEPT ENVIRONM & RESOURCE SCI, RENO, NV 89512 USA
[2] UNIV NEVADA, DESERT RES INST, DANDINI LN, RENO, NV 89506 USA
[3] USDA ARS, RENO, NV USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100060032x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Characterization of ion mobility is a first step in the understanding of nutrient flux relationships in alpine forested watersheds. Our purpose was to: (i) investigate the transport dynamics of inorganic N in Sierra Nevada soils by applying unspiked source water as a control, and a 1 mmol(c) L-1 NH4NO3 spiked solution to two soil types (granitic and andesitic) under forest and meadow conditions via artificial rainfall during moist (spring) and dry (late summer-early fall) seasons; and (ii) evaluate the presence of macropore or preferential matrix flow from characteristic profile distributions of the two N forms. Peak concentrations in surface flow discharge (runoff) of both N forms from control treatments occurred early for both soil types and were highest from the meadow areas (1.6-0.4 mg NO3--N L-1 meadow to forest for granitic soil and 0.3-0.1 mg L-1 meadow to forest for andesitic soil; 0.75-0.37 mg NH4+-N L-1 meadow to forest for granitic soil and 0.25-0.18 mg L-1 meadow to forest for andesitic soil). Both soils exhibited NH4+-N adsorption, but only the soil of andesitic origin appeared to sorb NO3--N. Andesitic soils of the Sierra Nevada may thus serve as a temporary sink for NO3--N deposition, whereas meadow areas of both soil types appear to serve as a source. Higher initial soil moisture for the spiked treatments generally resulted in the transport of MH4+-N to greater depths in both soils of forested cover (approximate to 40 compared with 20 cm from spring to late summer-early fall), and for NO3--N (approximate to 50 compared with 40 cm) as well. Wet-season (spring) mobility must therefore be considered an important groundwater nutrient transport mechanism in Sierra Nevada watershed soils.
引用
收藏
页码:1774 / 1780
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Ahuja L. R., 1991, Preferential flow: proceedings of the National Symposium, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 16-17 December 1991., P32
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOIL SURVEY TAHOE BA
[3]  
BASHIR SM, 1969, THESIS U NEVADA RENO
[4]  
BAUMER OW, 1983, SOIL SURVEY WASHOE C
[5]  
Bremmer JM., 1965, AGRONOMY, V9, P1179, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.2.C33
[6]   SEASONAL PREFERENTIAL FLOW IN 2 SIERRA-NEVADA SOILS UNDER FORESTED AND MEADOW COVER [J].
BURCAR, S ;
MILLER, WW ;
TYLER, SW ;
JOHNSON, DW .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1994, 58 (05) :1555-1561
[7]   NITROGEN UPTAKE AND RELEASE IN A FORESTED WATERSHED, LAKE TAHOE BASIN, CALIFORNIA [J].
COATS, RN ;
LEONARD, RL ;
GOLDMAN, CR .
ECOLOGY, 1976, 57 (05) :995-1004
[8]  
DeBano L.F., 1969, P S WAT REP SOILS 6, P17
[9]  
GILMAN GP, 1976, 16 CSIRO DIV SOILS
[10]  
HENDRICKX JMH, 1991, PREFERENTIAL FLOW, P22