Competition in the Supply Option Market

被引:63
作者
Martinez-de-Albebiz, Victor [1 ]
Simchi-Levi, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, IESE Business Sch, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[2] MIT, Ctr Operat Res, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CONTRACTS; AUCTIONS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1287/opre.1090.0735
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper develops a multiattribute competition model for procurement of short life-cycle products. In such an environment, the buyer installs dedicated production capacity at the suppliers before demand is realized. Final production orders are decided after demand materializes. Of course, the buyer is reluctant to bear all the capacity and inventory risk, and thus signs flexible contracts with several suppliers. We model the suppliers' offers as option contracts, where each supplier charges a reservation price per unit of capacity and an execution price per unit of delivered supply. These two parameters illustrate the trade-off between total price and flexibility of a contract, which are both important to the buyer. We model the interaction between suppliers and the buyer as a game in which the suppliers are the leaders and the buyer is the follower. Specifically, suppliers compete to provide supply capacity to the buyer, and the buyer optimizes its expected profit by selecting one or more suppliers. We characterize the suppliers' equilibria in pure strategies for a class of customer demand distributions. In particular, we show that this type of interaction gives rise to cluster competition. That is, in equilibrium suppliers tend to be clustered in small groups of two or three suppliers each, such that within the same group all suppliers use similar technologies and offer the same type of contract. Finally, we show that in equilibrium, supply chain inefficiencies-i.e., the loss of profit due to competition-are at most 25% of the profit of a centralized supply chain.
引用
收藏
页码:1082 / 1097
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, HDB OPERATIONS RES M
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, QUANTITATIVE MODELS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, OLIGOPOLY PRICING
[4]  
Barnes-Schuster D., 2002, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, V4, P171, DOI 10.1287/msom.4.3.171.7754
[5]  
Beil D., 2002, MANAGE SCI, V49, P1529
[6]   DESIGN COMPETITION THROUGH MULTIDIMENSIONAL AUCTIONS [J].
CHE, YK .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1993, 24 (04) :668-680
[7]   THE EXISTENCE OF EQUILIBRIUM IN DISCONTINUOUS ECONOMIC GAMES .1. THEORY [J].
DASGUPTA, P ;
MASKIN, E .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1986, 53 (01) :1-26
[8]   Backup agreements in fashion buying - The value of upstream flexibility [J].
Eppen, GD ;
Iyer, AV .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1997, 43 (11) :1469-1484
[9]  
ERLEI M, 2002, SOME FORGOTTEN EQUIL
[10]   LIMIT GAMES AND LIMIT EQUILIBRIA [J].
FUDENBERG, D ;
LEVINE, D .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1986, 38 (02) :261-279