Conversion of Hip Resurfacing With Retention of Monoblock Acetabular Shell Using Dual-Mobility Components

被引:10
作者
Blevins, Jason L. [1 ]
Shen, Tony S. [1 ]
Morgenstern, Rachelle [1 ]
DeNova, Thomas A. [1 ]
Su, Edwin P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Adult Reconstruct & Joint Replacement, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
hip resurfacing; conversion; retained cup; dual mobility; revision; hip arthroplasty; ADVERSE-REACTION; REVISION; ARTHROPLASTY; REPLACEMENTS; PSEUDOTUMOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.065
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Retention of the acetabular component is an option during conversion from hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of conversion of the femoral resurfacing component with retained acetabular components (RAC) and use of dual-mobility femoral heads to outcomes of patients treated with both component (BC) revisions. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of the clinical outcomes of HRA to THA conversions performed at a single institution between 2008 and 2017. Results: Seventy-one conversions were included (27 RAC and 44 BC). Average age at time of conversion was 54.4 years (range, 30-68 years). Median time to conversion was 5.14 (2.77-7.41) years and median follow-up post-conversion was 1.7 (0.33-4.0) years. There were no significant differences in indications for conversion between the 2 groups with the majority performed for complications related to elevated metal ions and aseptic loosening. Harris Hip Scores improved from pre-conversion to post-conversion in both cohorts (P < .01). There were no significant differences in pre-conversion and post-conversion metal ion levels between the RAC and BC groups. Serum metal ion levels decreased significantly in both cohorts (P < .01). There were 6 additional revisions in the cohort (4 in BC, 2 in RAC) at a median 2.94 (1.99-3.85) years post-conversion. Two RAC patients had intraprosthetic dislocations with extensive polyethylene wear requiring acetabular revision at median 3.92 (3.85-3.98) years post-conversion. Overall, there were a higher number of complications in the BC group related to acetabular fracture, failure of osseointegration, and periprosthetic joint infection; however, this did not reach statistical significance (P = .27). Conclusion: Salvage of an appropriately positioned, well-fixed HRA acetabular component is a reasonable option in the setting of conversion to THA using dual-mobility components. This technique avoids the morbidity of acetabular revision and was associated with a decrease in metal ion levels and improvements in short-term functional outcomes comparable to a BC revision. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2037 / 2044
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Biedermann R, 2005, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V87B, P762, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6
[2]   Histological Features of Pseudotumor-like Tissues From Metal-on-Metal Hips [J].
Campbell, Pat ;
Ebramzadeh, Edward ;
Nelson, Scott ;
Takamura, Karren ;
De Smet, Koen ;
Amstutz, Harlan C. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (09) :2321-2327
[3]   Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip - The influence of malpositioning of the components [J].
De Haan, R. ;
Campbell, P. A. ;
Su, E. P. ;
De Smet, K. A. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (09) :1158-1163
[4]   Revisions of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing: Lessons Learned and Improved Outcome [J].
De Smet, Koen A. ;
Van der Straeten, Catherine ;
Van Orsouw, Maarten ;
Doubi, Rachid ;
Backers, Katrien ;
Grammatopoulos, George .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 42 (02) :259-+
[5]   Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty 397 cases from the Australian Joint Replacement Registry [J].
de Steiger, Richard N. ;
Miller, Lisa N. ;
Prosser, Gareth H. ;
Graves, Stephen E. ;
Davidson, David C. ;
Stanford, Tyman E. .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2010, 81 (01) :72-76
[6]   Damage Assessment of Retrieved Birmingham Monoblock Cups: Is Conversion to Dual-Mobility Head a Viable Revision Option? [J].
Gascoyne, Trevor C. ;
Lanting, Brent A. ;
Derksen, Kieran J. ;
Teeter, Matthew G. ;
Turgeon, Thomas R. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (04) :1242-1246
[7]   Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome [J].
Grammatopoulos, G. ;
Pandit, H. ;
Kwon, Y. -M. ;
Gundle, R. ;
McLardy-Smith, P. ;
Beard, D. J. ;
Murray, D. W. ;
Gill, H. S. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (08) :1019-1024
[8]   EBRA - A METHOD TO MEASURE MIGRATION OF ACETABULAR COMPONENTS [J].
KRISMER, M ;
BAUER, R ;
TSCHUPIK, J ;
MAYRHOFER, P .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 28 (10) :1225-1236
[9]   Revision of Metal-on-metal Hip Prostheses Results in Marked Reduction of Blood Cobalt and Chromium Ion Concentrations [J].
Lainiala, Olli ;
Reito, Aleksi ;
Elo, Petra ;
Pajamaki, Jorma ;
Puolakka, Timo ;
Eskelinen, Antti .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 473 (07) :2305-2313
[10]   Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Hip Resurfacing Revision A Cohort Study Into the Second Decade After the Operation [J].
Matharu, Gulraj S. ;
Judge, Andrew ;
Murray, David W. ;
Pandit, Hemant G. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (17) :1444-1452