Does Writing Summaries Improve Memory for Text?

被引:22
|
作者
Spirgel, Arie S. [1 ]
Delaney, Peter F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol, POB 26170, Greensboro, NC 27402 USA
关键词
Memory; Writing to learn; Metamemory; Text memory; RETENTION; RETRIEVAL; ACHIEVEMENT; NOTETAKING; STRATEGIES; BENEFITS; SUPPORT; SKILLS; TASK;
D O I
10.1007/s10648-014-9290-2
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
In five experiments, we consistently found that items included in summaries were better remembered than items omitted from summaries. We did not, however, find evidence that summary writing was better than merely restudying the text. These patterns held with shorter and longer texts, when the text was present or absent during the summary writing, with both short answer and multiple choice criterion tests, with a brief delay prior to the final test or with a several day delay, and regardless of whether the summary was written immediately after reading the text or after a short time away from the text. We additionally found evidence that writing a summary sometimes helped participants estimate how much they learned from the text. However, it seems that students do not write effective summaries because they are quite poor at picking out the important points from the text.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 196
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does Writing Summaries Improve Memory for Text?
    Arie S. Spirgel
    Peter F. Delaney
    Educational Psychology Review, 2016, 28 : 171 - 196
  • [2] Strategies of writing summaries for hard news texts: A text analysis approach
    Ke, Li Yuan
    Hoey, Michael
    DISCOURSE STUDIES, 2014, 16 (01) : 89 - 105
  • [3] Elaborative Retrieval: Do Semantic Mediators Improve Memory?
    Lehman, Melissa
    Karpicke, Jeffrey D.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2016, 42 (10) : 1573 - 1591
  • [4] Teachers' monitoring of students' text comprehension: can students' keywords and summaries improve teachers' judgment accuracy?
    Engelen, Jan A. A.
    Camp, Gino
    van de Pol, Janneke
    de Bruin, Anique B. H.
    METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2018, 13 (03) : 287 - 307
  • [5] Discovery Through Writing: Relationships with Writing Processes and Text Quality
    Baaijen, Veerle M.
    Galbraith, David
    COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 2018, 36 (03) : 199 - 223
  • [6] Successful cuing of gender source memory does not improve location source memory
    Hicks, Jason L.
    Starns, Jeffrey J.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2016, 44 (04) : 650 - 659
  • [7] Gaze patterns reveal how situation models and text representations contribute to episodic text memory
    Johansson, Roger
    Oren, Franziska
    Holmqvist, Kenneth
    COGNITION, 2018, 175 : 53 - 68
  • [8] Production Does Not Improve Memory for Face-Name Associations
    Hourihan, Kathleen L.
    Smith, Alexis R. S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2016, 70 (02): : 147 - 153
  • [9] Symbolism itself does not improve memory for elements on the periodic table
    Roberts, Brady R. T.
    Tran, Sophia H. N.
    Fernandes, Myra A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [10] Summaries Writing to Enhance Reading Comprehension: Systematic Literature Review from 2014 to 2021
    Budianto, Aris
    Setyosari, Punaji
    Kuswandi, Dedi
    Ulfa, Saida
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2022, 8 (01): : 149 - 161