GP attitudes and self-reported behaviour in primary care consultations for low back pain

被引:59
作者
Corbett, Mandy [1 ]
Foster, Nadine [1 ]
Ong, Bie Nio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Keele, Arthrit Res Campaign Natl Primary Care Ctr, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
关键词
Doctor-patient relationship; evidence; guideline recommendations; low back pain; qualitative research; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; HEALTH-CARE; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINES; CHALLENGE;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cmp042
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective. To qualitatively examine the attitudes and self-reported behaviour of GPs in relation to guideline adherence for patients with LBP. Method. A mixed-method design combining a national UK-based survey of GPs and physiotherapists with an embedded qualitative study. This report focuses only on the GP interviews. We explored GPs' experience of managing LBP patients and the rationale for treatment offered to a patient described in a written vignette. All interviews were digitally recorded, fully transcribed and analysed using the constant comparative method. Results. GPs encountered difficulties adhering to guideline recommendations for LBP patients. They experienced particular tensions between recommendations to stay active versus the expectation of being prescribed rest. GPs expressed that chronic LBP often poses an intractable problem requiring specialist advice. The perception that guideline recommendations are 'imposed' may create resistance, and the evidence base is not always considered believable. Conclusions. GPs acknowledge guideline recommendations but divergence occurs in implementation. This is due to GPs focussing on the whole person-not just one condition-and the importance of maintaining the doctor-patient relationship, which relies on effective negotiation of mutual perceptions and expectations. Further exploration on how consultation processes can be constructed to effectively combine evidence with patient-centred care is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 364
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Brokerage and Closure
[2]  
[Anonymous], REITH LECT QUESTION
[3]   How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists [J].
Bishop, Annette ;
Foster, Nadine E. ;
Thomas, Elaine ;
Hay, Elaine M. .
PAIN, 2008, 135 (1-2) :187-195
[4]   You feel so hopeless: A qualitative study of GP management of acute back pain [J].
Breen, Alan ;
Austin, Helen ;
Campion-Smith, Charles ;
Carr, Eloise ;
Mann, Eileen .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2007, 11 (01) :21-29
[5]   Chronic low back pain in general practice: the challenge of the consultation [J].
Chew-Graham, C ;
May, C .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1999, 16 (01) :46-49
[6]  
Clinical Standards Advisory Group, 1994, EP REV EP COST BACK
[7]   The challenge of using the low back pain guidelines: a qualitative research [J].
Dahan, Rachel ;
Borkan, Jeffry ;
Brown, Judith-Bell ;
Reis, Shmuel ;
Hermoni, Doron ;
Harris, Stewart .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2007, 13 (04) :616-620
[8]   Evidence-based medicine and the implementation gap [J].
Dopson, S ;
Locock, L ;
Gabbay, J ;
Ferlie, E ;
Fitzgerald, L .
HEALTH, 2003, 7 (03) :311-330
[9]   Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study [J].
Freeman, AC ;
Sweeney, K .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7321) :1100-1102A
[10]   Health care providers' orientations towards common low back pain predict perceived harmfulness of physical activities and recommendations regarding return to normal activity [J].
Houben, RMA ;
Ostelo, RWJG ;
Vlaeyen, JWS ;
Wolters, PMJC ;
Peters, M ;
Stomp-van den Berg, SGM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2005, 9 (02) :173-183