Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy in Children: With and Without Stent Initial Tertiary Care Center Experience with More Than 1-Year Follow-Up

被引:2
作者
Srivastava, Alok [1 ]
Dhayal, Ishwar Ram [1 ]
Rai, Priyanka [2 ]
机构
[1] Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol & Renal Transplant, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Baba Raghav Das Med Coll Ringgold Stand Inst, Dept Surg, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
children; stent; laparoscopic ureterolithotomy; SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; PEDIATRIC UROLITHIASIS; URETERAL STONES; MANAGEMENT; URETEROSCOPY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1055/s-0036-1572551
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background The purpose of our study was to assess the safety and feasibility of transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) in children with ureteric stones with and without a stent. Method Impacted ureteric stone of size >= 1.5 cm or ureteric stones that were refractory to shock wave lithotripsy (SWL)/ureteroscopy (URS) were considered for LU. From December 2009 to April 2012, 50 cases of LU were performed with a stent being placed. From May 2012 onward we now perform stentless LU and till now we have done approximately 64 such type of cases. Out of these, 48 have completed more than 1 year of follow-up and we took these as our study group and the previous 50 (LU with stent) as our control group. Baseline characteristics along with certain per- and postoperative findings of the two groups were noted and analyzed. Ultrasonography and X-ray kidney, ureter, and bladder region were done at 3, 9 months, 1 year, and yearly thereafter. Intravenous urography was done at 6 months statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS ver. 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States). The data were analyzed by using the Mann-Whitney test and a p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results The baseline characteristics were similar in both the groups with 100% stone clearance in all. LU with stent differed from the stentless group in terms of more requirement of analgesics and the need for a second procedure for stent removal, but with no cases of urine leak in the postoperative period. Conclusion LU in children is a safe and viable option, especially for impacted stones or as a salvage procedure for ureteric stones when SWL or transureteral lithotripsy has failed.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 154
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy for recurrent lower-ureteral stones previously treated with open ureterolithotomy: Initial experience in 11 cases
    Abolyosr, Ahmad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (05) : 525 - 529
  • [2] Laparoscopic management of pediatric renal and ureteric stones
    Agrawal, Vikesh
    Bajaj, Jitin
    Acharya, H.
    Chanchalani, R.
    Raina, V. K.
    Sharma, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2013, 9 (02) : 230 - 233
  • [3] Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children:: experience using a mpl-9000 lithotriptor
    Aksoy, Y
    Özbey, I
    Atmaca, AF
    Polat, Ö
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 22 (02) : 115 - 119
  • [4] Anesthesia for pediatric lithotripsy
    Aldridge, RD
    Aldridge, RC
    Aldridge, LM
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2006, 16 (03) : 236 - 241
  • [5] Basiri Abbas, 2008, Urol J, V5, P67
  • [6] Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy for the treatment of ureteral calculi
    Demirci, D
    Gülmez, I
    Ekmekçioglu, O
    Karacagil, M
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2004, 73 (03) : 234 - 237
  • [7] Minimal access surgery in the management of pediatric urolithiasis
    Fragoso, Ana Catarina
    Valla, Jean-Stephane
    Steyaert, Henry
    Arnaud, Pierre
    Esposito, Ciro
    Estevao-Costa, Jose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2009, 5 (01) : 42 - 46
  • [8] Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and long-term follow-up
    Gaur, DD
    Trivedi, S
    Prabhudesai, MR
    Madhusudhana, HR
    Gopichand, M
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 89 (04) : 339 - 343
  • [9] Evaluation of Ureteral Stent Placement After Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for Upper Ureteral Stone: Randomized Controlled Study
    Hammady, Ahmed
    Gamal, Wael Mohamed
    Zaki, Mohamed
    Hussein, Mohamed
    Abuzeid, Abdelmonem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (05) : 825 - 830
  • [10] Hill D E, 1990, J UROLOGY, V144, P492