Use of shape correspondence analysis to quantify skeletal changes associated with bone-anchored Class III correction

被引:32
|
作者
Tung Nguyen [1 ]
Cevidanes, Lucia [2 ]
Paniagua, Beatriz [3 ]
Zhu, Hongtu [4 ]
Koerich, Leonardo [1 ]
De Clerck, Hugo [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Orthodont, Chapel Hill, NC 27516 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Orthodont & Pediat Dent, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Chapel Hill, NC 27516 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Gilling Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27516 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Chapel Hill, NC 27516 USA
关键词
Skeletal anchorage; Class III; Growth modification; Bone anchor; 3-D; RAPID MAXILLARY EXPANSION; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; 3-DIMENSIONAL ASSESSMENT; MACACA-MULATTA; FACE MASK; PROTRACTION; THERAPY; TRACTION; CHILDREN; GROWTH;
D O I
10.2319/041513-288.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the three-dimensional (3D) skeletal changes in the mandibles of Class III patients treated with bone-anchored maxillary protraction using shape correspondence analysis. Material and Method: Twenty-five consecutive patients with skeletal Class Ill who were between the ages of 9 and 13 years (mean age, 11.10 +/- 1.1 years) were treated using Class Ill intermaxillary elastics and bilateral miniplates (two in the infrazygomatic crests of the maxilla and two in the anterior mandible). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed for each patient before initial loading (T1) and at 1 year out (T2). From the CBCT scans, 3D models were generated, registered on the anterior cranial base, and analyzed using 3D linear distances and vectors between corresponding point-based surfaces. Results: Bone-anchored traction produced anteroposterior and vertical skeletal changes in the mandible. The novel application of Shape correspondence analysis showed vectors of mean ( standard deviation) distal displacement of the posterior ramus of 3.6 +/- 1.4 mm, while the chin displaced backward by 0.5 +/- 3.92 mm. The lower border of the mandible at the menton region was displaced downward by 2.6 +/- 1.2 mm, and the lower border at the gonial region moved downward by 3.6 1.4 mm. There was a downward and backward displacement around the gonial region with a mean closure of the gonial angle by 2.1 degrees. The condyles were displaced distally by a mean of 2.6 +/- 1.5 mm, and there were three distinct patterns for displacement: 44% backward, 40% backward and downward, and 16% backward and upward. Conclusion: This treatment approach induces favorable control of the mandibular growth pattern and can be used to treat patients with components of mandibular prognathisnn.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 336
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored Class III intermaxillary traction
    De Clerck, Hugo
    Tung Nguyen
    de Paula, Leonardo Koerich
    Cevidanes, Lucia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 142 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [2] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction to correct a class III skeletal relationship: A multicenter retrospective analysis of 218 patients
    Van Hevele, Jeroen
    Nout, Erik
    Claeys, Thomas
    Meyns, Joeri
    Scheerlinck, Jan
    Politis, Constantinus
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (10) : 1800 - 1806
  • [3] Individualized 3D-Printed Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction Device for Growth Modification in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
    Kim, Minji
    Li, Jingwen
    Kim, Sehyang
    Kim, Wonho
    Kim, Sun-Hyun
    Lee, Sung-Min
    Park, Young Long
    Yang, Sook
    Kim, Jin-Woo
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [4] Comparative efficacy of the bone-anchored maxillary protraction protocols for orthopaedic treatment in skeletal Class III malocclusion: A Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Hu, Shoushan
    An, Ke
    Peng, Yiran
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (02) : 243 - 250
  • [5] Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction for Adolescents with Cleft Palate and Class III Malocclusion: A Case Series
    Chin, Madeline G.
    Gishen, Kriya E.
    Bedar, Meiwand
    Huang, Kelly X.
    Laguardia, Jonnby S.
    Moghadam, Shahrzad
    Lee, Justine C.
    Panchura, Juliana
    Wilson, Libby F.
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2025, 62 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [6] Three-dimensional comparative evaluation of customized bone-anchored vs tooth-borne maxillary protraction in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion
    Liang, Shuran
    Wang, Fan
    Chang, Qiao
    Bai, Yuxing
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 160 (03) : 374 - 384
  • [7] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and Class III malocclusion
    Ren, Yijin
    Steegman, Ralph
    Dieters, Arjan
    Jansma, Johan
    Stamatakis, Harry
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (05) : 2429 - 2441
  • [8] Orthopedic and Nonsurgical Orthodontic Treatment of Adolescent Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction and Temporary Anchorage Devices: A Case Report
    Alnefaie, Mohammed
    Han, Woo-Jin
    Ahn, Yoon-Soo
    Baik, Won-Kyeong
    Choi, Sung-Hwan
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2022, 9 (05):
  • [9] Modification Protocol for an Early Class III Treatment Using 3 Miniplates for Bone-Anchored Maxillary Orthopedic Traction
    Kim, Kyung A.
    Seo, Kyung Won
    Kim, Seong-Hun
    Chung, Kyu-Rhim
    Nelson, Gerald
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (05) : E440 - E442
  • [10] Three-dimensional assessment of soft tissue changes associated with bone-anchored maxillary protraction protocols
    Elnagar, Mohammed H.
    Elshourbagy, Eman
    Ghobashy, Safaa
    Khedr, Mohamed
    Kusnoto, Budi
    Evans, Carla A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 152 (03) : 336 - 347