Correlation of digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen levels for detection of prostate cancer: Retrospective analysis results from a tertiary care urology center

被引:4
作者
Sarkar, Debansu [1 ]
Jain, Pritesh [2 ]
Gupta, Piyush [1 ]
Pal, Dilip Kumar [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Post Grad Med Educ & Res, Dept Urol, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
[3] Inst Post Grad Med Educ & Res, Dept Urol, Kolkata 700020, West Bengal, India
关键词
Digital Rectal Examination; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; TRUS biopsy; ULTRASOUND; ERSPC; LUNG;
D O I
10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1818_20
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate the detection rate of prostate cancer by digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels followed by standard 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: After screening of patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) using DRE and serum PSA level, we enrolled patients for TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy. Indications included PSA level >= 4 ng/ml and/or suspicious DRE findings. A retrospective analysis was done to find out the correlation between suspicious rectal examination and various serum PSA levels in detection of cancer prostate. Results: A total of 847 patients were screened for cancer prostate during our study period (May 2012-February 2020). Among them, 823 patients who underwent prostate biopsy were analyzed. Prostate cancer was detected in 330 cases (40.09%). Mean age of patient (years) with and without prostate cancer was 66.25 +/- 9.45 and 64.3 +/- 8.96 years, respectively. Median value of serum PSA in patients positive for cancer was 33 +/- 260 ng/ml compared to patients without cancer, who had a median value of 9 +/- 64 ng/ml (P-value of <0.0001). The detection rate of cancer based on suspicious DRE findings irrespective of PSA was 52.18% (251/481), compared to 45.46% (311/684) using a PSA cut-off of =4.0 ng/ml alone. Among 330 patients with positive biopsy, 19 (5.75%) had a PSA level <4 ng/ml and they were identified based on suspicious DRE alone. Conclusion: Suspicious DRE was significantly associated with detection of prostate cancer across all PSA levels. Patients with PSA <4 can harbor prostate malignancy and such cases can be detected by use of DRE in screening of all patients with LUTS.
引用
收藏
页码:1646 / 1650
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: Findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial [J].
Andriole, GL ;
Levin, DL ;
Crawford, ED ;
Gelmann, ER ;
Pinsky, PF ;
Chia, D ;
Kramer, BS ;
Reding, D ;
Church, TR ;
Grubb, RL ;
Izmirlian, G ;
Ragard, LR ;
Clapp, JD ;
Prorok, PC ;
Gohagan, JK .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (06) :433-438
[2]   Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 2.2016 [J].
Carroll, Peter R. ;
Parsons, J. Kellogg ;
Andriole, Gerald ;
Bahnson, Robert R. ;
Castle, Erik P. ;
Catalona, William J. ;
Dahl, Douglas M. ;
Davis, John W. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Etzioni, Ruth B. ;
Farrington, Thomas ;
Hemstreet, George P., III ;
Kawachi, Mark H. ;
Kim, Simon ;
Lange, Paul H. ;
Loughlin, Kevin R. ;
Lowrance, William ;
Maroni, Paul ;
Mohler, James ;
Morgan, Todd M. ;
Moses, Kelvin A. ;
Nadler, Robert B. ;
Poch, Michael ;
Scales, Chuck ;
Shaneyfelt, Terrence M. ;
Smaldone, Marc C. ;
Sonn, Geoffrey ;
Sprenkle, Preston ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Wake, Robert ;
Shead, Dorothy A. ;
Freedman-Cass, Deborah A. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2016, 14 (05) :509-519
[3]   Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA Guideline [J].
Carter, H. Ballentine ;
Albertsen, Peter C. ;
Barry, Michael J. ;
Etzioni, Ruth ;
Freedland, Stephen J. ;
Greene, Kirsten Lynn ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Kantoff, Philip ;
Konety, Badrinath R. ;
Murad, Mohammad Hassan ;
Penson, David F. ;
Zietman, Anthony L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (02) :419-426
[4]   EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATE-CANCER BY ROUTINE SCREENING [J].
CHODAK, GW ;
SCHOENBERG, HW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 252 (23) :3261-3264
[5]   The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam [J].
Gosselaar, Claartje ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Roemeling, Stijn ;
Schroder, Fritz H. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (03) :581-588
[6]   Use of Digital Rectal Examination as an Adjunct to Prostate Specific Antigen in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer [J].
Halpern, Joshua A. ;
Oromendia, Clara ;
Shoag, Jonathan E. ;
Mittal, Sameer ;
Cosiano, Michael F. ;
Ballman, Karla V. ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Hu, Jim C. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04) :947-953
[7]  
Heyns CF, 2001, S AFR MED J, V91, P679
[8]   RANDOM SYSTEMATIC VERSUS DIRECTED ULTRASOUND GUIDED TRANS-RECTAL CORE BIOPSIES OF THE PROSTATE [J].
HODGE, KK ;
MCNEAL, JE ;
TERRIS, MK ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (01) :71-75
[9]   Assessment of the value of the different variants of abnormal digital rectal examination finding in predicting carcinoma of the prostate: a preliminary report of a two-center study [J].
Irekpita, Eshiobo ;
Achor, George Okwudili ;
Alili, Ugochukwu .
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 26 (01)
[10]  
Presti Joseph C, 2007, Rev Urol, V9, P93