Evaluation of two-view geometry methods with automatic ground-truth generation

被引:2
作者
Lakemond, Ruan [1 ]
Fookes, Clinton [1 ]
Sridharan, Sridha [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Image & Video Res Lab, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Evaluation; Database; Automated ground truth; Structure from motion; Multi-view geometry; INTEREST POINT DETECTORS; CALIBRATION; DESCRIPTORS; PERFORMANCE; FEATURES; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.imavis.2013.09.002
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A large number of methods have been published that aim to evaluate various components of multi-view geometry systems. Most of these have focused on the feature extraction, description and matching stages (the visual front end), since geometry computation can be evaluated through simulation. Many data sets are constrained to small scale scenes or planar scenes that are not challenging to new algorithms, or require special equipment. This paper presents a method for automatically generating geometry ground truth and challenging test cases from high spatio-temporal resolution video. The objective of the system is to enable data collection at any physical scale, in any location and in various parts of the electromagnetic spectrum. The data generation process consists of collecting high resolution video, computing accurate sparse 3D reconstruction, video frame culling and down sampling, and test case selection. The evaluation process consists of applying a test 2-view geometry method to every test case and comparing the results to the ground truth. This system facilitates the evaluation of the whole geometry computation process or any part thereof against data compatible with a realistic application. A collection of example data sets and evaluations is included to demonstrate the range of applications of the proposed system. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 934
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   A Comparative Study of Interest Point Performance on a Unique Data Set [J].
Aanaes, Henrik ;
Dahl, Anders Lindbjerg ;
Pedersen, Kim Steenstrup .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 2012, 97 (01) :18-35
[2]   Self-calibration of rotating and zooming cameras [J].
Agapito, L ;
Hayman, E ;
Reid, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 2001, 45 (02) :107-127
[3]  
[Anonymous], P INT C SIGN PROC CO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 2006 IEEE COMP SOC C
[5]  
[Anonymous], P EUROPEAN C COMPUTE, DOI DOI 10.1007/3-540-57956-7
[6]   Lucas-Kanade 20 years on: A unifying framework [J].
Baker, S ;
Matthews, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 2004, 56 (03) :221-255
[7]   A Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow [J].
Baker, Simon ;
Scharstein, Daniel ;
Lewis, J. P. ;
Roth, Stefan ;
Black, Michael J. ;
Szeliski, Richard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 2011, 92 (01) :1-31
[8]   SURF: Speeded up robust features [J].
Bay, Herbert ;
Tuytelaars, Tinne ;
Van Gool, Luc .
COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2006 , PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 3951 :404-417
[9]   Edge detector evaluation using empirical ROC curves [J].
Bowyer, K ;
Kranenburg, C ;
Dougherty, S .
COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2001, 84 (01) :77-103
[10]  
Bradski G., DR DOBBS J SOFTWARE