A techno-economic analysis (TEA) of a combined process of torrefaction and gasification of lignocellulose biomass (bagasse) for methanol and electricity production

被引:9
作者
Fajimi, L., I [1 ]
Chrisostomou, J. [1 ]
Oboirien, B. O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Chem Engn, Doornfontein Campus, ZA-2094 Johannesburg, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Torrefaction; Gasification; Methanol; Electricity; Economic analysis; INTEGRATED PROCESS; PROCESS SIMULATION; SUGARCANE BAGASSE; CARBON-DIOXIDE; CONVERSION;
D O I
10.1007/s13399-022-03499-6
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study investigates a comprehensive process for the production of methanol and electricity from bagasse. A total of four main scenarios (S1-S4) were considered in this study, they are bagasse gasification for methanol and electricity co-production with torrefaction (S1), and bagasse gasification for the production of electricity only with torrefaction (S2) while the other two (S3 and S4) are without torrefaction process respectively. The gasification process was modelled in Aspen Plus using a kinetic-free equilibrium model using steam and pure oxygen as the gasification agent. For the syngas cleaning, the Rectisol process was employed while for the methanol synthesis, hydrogenation reactions of CO2 and CO coupled with the water gas shift reaction were employed. From the result obtained, the process involving torrefaction has more syngas yield; hence, more methanol was synthesized (0.48kg(MeOH)/kg(Bagasse)) when compared to the process without torrefaction (0.41kg(MeOH)/kg(Bagasse)). The syngas from the torrefaction processes also has higher lower heating values (LHV) of 9.25 MJ/Nm(3) and 8.71 MJ/Nm(3) for S1 and S2, when compared to that without torrefaction (S3 and S4) with LHV of 9.00 MJ/Nm(3) and 8.49 MJ/Nm(3) respectively. In addition, the economics involved in the production process of the four scenarios were investigated in terms of the key economic parameters which include the net present value (NPV), the rate of return on investment (ROROI), and the discounted payback period (DPBP). The result showed that S1 is the most economically viable production route. The sensitivity analysis also shows that revenue from the sales of the main products (methanol and electricity), as well as the cost of raw material materials, was the most sensitive. These two will incur the highest risk on the total investments from the four scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:12501 / 12516
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Ajadi T., 2020, Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2020
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Int J Eng Technol, DOI DOI 10.14419/IJET.V7I2.8489
[3]  
Anukam A., 2014, J ENERGY, V2014, P9, DOI 10.1155/2014/713054
[4]  
Anukam Anthony, 2017, Bioengineering-Basel, V4, P22, DOI 10.3390/bioengineering4010022
[5]   An Investigation into the Impact of Reaction Temperature on Various Parameters during Torrefaction of Sugarcane Bagasse Relevant to Gasification [J].
Anukam, Anthony ;
Mamphweli, Sampson ;
Reddy, Prashant ;
Okoh, Omobola ;
Meyer, Edson .
JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2015, 2015
[6]  
AnukamA, 2013, THESIS U FORT HARE S
[7]   Upgrading biomass fuels via wet torrefaction: A review and comparison with dry torrefaction [J].
Bach, Quang-Vu ;
Skreiberg, Oyvind .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 54 :665-677
[8]   Towards full one-pass conversion of carbon dioxide to methanol and methanol-derived products [J].
Bansode, Atul ;
Urakawa, Atsushi .
JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS, 2014, 309 :66-70
[9]   Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Gasification and Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis Integrated to Sugarcane Biorefineries [J].
Bressanin, Jessica Marcon ;
Klein, Bruno Colling ;
Chagas, Mateus Ferreira ;
Barbosa Watanabe, Marcos Djun ;
Lobo de Mesquita Sampaio, Isabelle ;
Bonomi, Antonio ;
de Morais, Edvaldo Rodrigo ;
Cavalett, Otavio .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (17)
[10]   Integrated process of lignocellulosic biomass torrefaction and pyrolysis for upgrading bio-oil production: A state-of-the-art review [J].
Dai, Leilei ;
Wang, Yunpu ;
Liu, Yuhuan ;
Ruan, Roger ;
He, Chao ;
Yu, Zhenting ;
Jiang, Lin ;
Zeng, Zihong ;
Tian, Xiaojie .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 107 :20-36