Uncertainty in territory quality affects the benefits of usurpation in a Mediterranean wrasse

被引:27
作者
Alonzo, SH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Inst Marine Sci, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
territoriality; stochasticity; labridae; sexual conflict; assessment;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/arh007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Individuals should defend sites when the expected benefits of the territory exceed the cost of defense. However, if territory qulaity is unpredictable or difficult to assess, the expected pattern of territorial behavior is less clear. In a Mediterranean wrasse, Symphodus ocellatus, mating success is skewed with 2% of nesting males getting more than 20% of the spawning success. Yet, variation in mating success is not explained by any known physical characteristic of males or their territories. Instead, females prefer nests with a recent history of mating success because males are less likely to desert the offspring she leaves behind. Thus, territory quality is transient and determined by interactions between the sexes. I measured the frequency of territorial takeovers and the uncertainty in mating success among days at a nest. Observations indicated that S. ocellatus males usurped their neighbor's successful nests when males were unsuccessful and larger than their successful neighbor. Sites that achieved mating success had a significantly higher probability (0.84) of remaining sucessful between consecutive days than unsuccessful territories had of becoming successful (0.30). Unsuccessful males obtained higher and more certain fitness returns if they usurped a successful neighbor's territory. Interactions within and between the sexes drive uncertainty in success, which influences territorial behavior in this species.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 285
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
[31]   HEADS I WIN, TAILS YOU LOSE - TESTING DIRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESES IN ECOLOGICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY RESEARCH [J].
RICE, WR ;
GAINES, SD .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1994, 9 (06) :235-237
[32]   Modelling territorial behaviour of animals in variable environments [J].
Ruxton, GD ;
Armstrong, JD ;
Humphries, S .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1999, 58 :113-120
[33]  
SCHOENER TW, 1987, AM ZOOL, V27, P259
[34]   SIMPLE-MODELS OF OPTIMAL FEEDING-TERRITORY SIZE - A RECONCILIATION [J].
SCHOENER, TW .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1983, 121 (05) :608-629
[35]   ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF TERRITORIAL POLYGYNY IN BIRDS [J].
SEARCY, WA ;
YASUKAWA, K .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1989, 134 (03) :323-343
[36]   THE REPRODUCTIVE-BEHAVIOR OF ANTHIDIUM-MANICATUM (HYMENOPTERA, MEGACHILIDAE) AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SIZE FOR TERRITORIAL MALES [J].
SEVERINGHAUS, LL ;
KURTAK, BH ;
EICKWORT, GC .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1981, 9 (01) :51-58
[37]  
SHAPIRO SS, 1965, BIOMETRIKA, V52, P591, DOI 10.2307/2333709
[38]  
SHUTLER D, 1991, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V28, P235
[39]  
Siegel S., 1988, NONPARAMETRIC STAT B
[40]   TERRITORIAL BEHAVIOR - TESTING THE ASSUMPTIONS [J].
STAMPS, J .
ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF BEHAVIOR, VOL 23, 1994, 23 :173-232