An evaluation of digital, split-site and traditional formats in conference poster sessions

被引：13

作者：

Bell, Catriona ^{[1
]}

Buckley, E. Graham ^{[1
]}

Evans, Phillip ^{[1
]}

Lloyd-Jones, Gaynor ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Med, Med Teaching Org, Coll Med & Vet Med, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland

来源：

MEDICAL TEACHER | 2006年 / 28卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/01421590600622806

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

The paper reports an evaluation of digital, split-site and traditional poster presentations at the Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) conference in September 2004. The programme included 300 posters in 19 sessions, viewed, potentially, by 1265 conference participants, in parallel with other events. The instrument was a questionnaire of 16 open- and closed-format questions applied opportunistically and gaining 250 complete responses. Qualitative and quantitative analysis suggested that no one format was preferred. Each had different strengths and weaknesses relating to seeing and hearing the presenter and viewing the poster. Opportunities for discussion were highly valued.

引用

页码：175 / 179

页数：5