Interaural Pitch-Discrimination Range Effects for Bilateral and Single-Sided-Deafness Cochlear-Implant Users

被引:18
作者
Goupell, Matthew J. [1 ]
Cosentino, Stefano [1 ]
Stakhovskaya, Olga A. [1 ,2 ]
Bernstein, Joshua G. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Hearing & Speech Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Walter Reed Natl Mil Med Ctr, Natl Mil Audiol & Speech Pathol Ctr, Bethesda, MD 20889 USA
来源
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY | 2019年 / 20卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cochlear implant; pitch; binaural hearing; interaural mismatch; ELECTRODE DISCRIMINATION; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; TIME DIFFERENCES; BRAIN-STEM; SENSITIVITY; PLACE; PERCEPTION; UNMASKING; HEARING; ONSET;
D O I
10.1007/s10162-018-00707-x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
By allowing bilateral access to sound, bilateral cochlear implants (BI-CIs) or unilateral CIs for individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD; i.e., normal or near-normal hearing in one ear) can improve sound localization and speech understanding in noise. Spatial hearing in the horizontal plane is primarily conveyed by interaural time and level differences computed from neurons in the superior olivary complex that receive frequency-matched inputs. Because BI-CIs and SSD-CIs do not necessarily convey frequency-matched information, it is critical to understand how to align the inputs to CI users. Previous studies show that interaural pitch discrimination for SSD-CI listeners is highly susceptible to contextual biases, questioning its utility for establishing interaural frequency alignment. Here, we replicate this finding for SSD-CI listeners and show that these biases also extend to BI-CI listeners. To assess the testing-range bias, three ranges of comparison electrodes (BI-CI) or pure-tone frequencies (SSD-CI) were tested: full range, apical/lower half, or basal/upper half. To assess the reference bias, the reference electrode was either held fixed throughout a testing block or randomly chosen from three electrodes (basal end, middle, or apical end of the array). Results showed no effect of reference electrode randomization, but a large testing range bias; changing the center of the testing-range shifted the pitch match by an average 63% (BI-CI) or 43% (SSD-CI) of the change magnitude. This bias diminished pitch-match accuracy, with a change in reference electrode shifting the pitch match only an average 34% (BI-CI) or 40% (SSD-CI) of the expected amount. Because these effects extended to the relatively more symmetric BI-CI listeners, the results suggest that the bias cannot be attributed to interaural asymmetry. Unless the range effect can be minimized or accounted for, a pitch-discrimination task will produce interaural place-of-stimulation estimates that are highly influenced by the conditions tested, rather than reflecting a true interaural place-pitch comparison.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 203
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation - fact or fantasy?
    Adunka, OF
    Pillsbury, HC
    Kiefer, J
    [J]. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2006, 126 (05) : 475 - 482
  • [2] Clinically Paired Electrodes Are Often Not Perceived as Pitch Matched
    Aronoff, Justin M.
    Padilla, Monica
    Stelmach, Julia
    Landsberger, David M.
    [J]. TRENDS IN HEARING, 2016, 20
  • [3] Pitch ranking with deeply inserted electrode arrays
    Baumann, U
    Nobbe, A
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2004, 25 (03) : 275 - 283
  • [4] Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness
    Bernstein, Joshua G. W.
    Stakhovskaya, Olga A.
    Schuchman, Gerald I.
    Jensen, Kenneth K.
    Goupell, Matthew J.
    [J]. TRENDS IN HEARING, 2018, 22
  • [5] Bierer JA, 2014, EAR HEARING, V35, P641, DOI 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000058
  • [6] Neural and behavioral sensitivity to interaural time differences using amplitude modulated tones with mismatched carrier frequencies
    Blanks, Deidra A.
    Roberts, Jason M.
    Buss, Emily
    Hall, Joseph W.
    Fitzpatrick, Douglas C.
    [J]. JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2007, 8 (03): : 393 - 408
  • [7] Pitch Comparisons between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Normal-hearing Contralateral Ear
    Carlyon, Robert P.
    Macherey, Olivier
    Frijns, Johan H. M.
    Axon, Patrick R.
    Kalkman, Randy K.
    Boyle, Patrick
    Baguley, David M.
    Briggs, John
    Deeks, John M.
    Briaire, Jeroen J.
    Barreau, Xavier
    Dauman, Rene
    [J]. JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 11 (04): : 625 - 640
  • [8] CARR CE, 1990, J NEUROSCI, V10, P3227
  • [9] A relation between electrode discrimination and amplitude modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners
    Chatterjee, Monita
    Yu, Jian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 127 (01) : 415 - 426
  • [10] Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences with Combined Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimulation
    Francart, Tom
    Brokx, Jan
    Wouters, Jan
    [J]. JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2009, 10 (01): : 131 - 141