The effect of tribochemical silica treatment on the shear bond strength of dental composite resin to gold electroformed surface

被引:1
作者
Kim, WH
Kim, KM
Lee, YK
Lee, KW
Kim, KN
Shim, JS
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, Res Ctr Orofacial Hard Tissue Regenerat, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Dent Biomat & Bioengn, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, Res Inst Dent Biomat & Bioengn, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Seoul 120752, South Korea
来源
BIOCERAMICS 18, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2006年 / 309-311卷
关键词
biocompatible; gold electroforming restoration; silica coating; tribochemical bonding; thione monomer;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.309-311.1405
中图分类号
TQ174 [陶瓷工业]; TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Gold electroforming restoration (GER) may be used as an alterative to the currently available porcelain-fused-to-metal and all ceramic dental restoration system. However, the quality and strength of bonding between the gold coping and composite resin need to be further investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatment between resin composite veneering materials and gold electroforming coping. In this study, the shear bond test was performed to measure the bond strength of composite resin and GER of which surfaces have been treated by sandblasting only (control), by methods of tribochemical silica coating (Rocatec) or by painting with a primer (Metaltite). Shear bond strengths were measured at a cross-head speed of 1.0 mm/minute with Instron and determined after thermocycling (1,200 cycles). ANOVA showed differences among the surface treatment groups (P < 0.05). The GER with Metaltite treatments resulted in the highest bond strengths. Values for Metaltite-treated group were higher than those for Rocatec-treated group. The control specimens showed the lowest bond strength value. The results suggest that both Metaltite primer and Rocatec system represent useful methods to improve the bond between the GER and composite resin veneering.
引用
收藏
页码:1405 / 1408
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
ARIEL J, 1998, J DENT TECHNOL, V15, P13
[2]   CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE OF RESIN-BONDED BRIDGES - A 5-YEAR PROSPECTIVE-STUDY .3. FAILURE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURVIVAL AFTER REBONDING [J].
CREUGERS, NHJ ;
SNOEK, PA ;
VANTHOF, MA ;
KAYSER, AF .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1990, 17 (02) :179-186
[3]  
HIDEO M, 2001, J PROSTHET DENT, V86, P315
[4]   TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN-BONDED NONPRECIOUS ALLOYS WITH CHEMICALLY AND MECHANICALLY ROUGHENED SURFACES [J].
ISIDOR, F ;
HASSNA, NM ;
JOSEPHSEN, K ;
KAABER, S .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1991, 7 (04) :225-229
[5]  
Kawamura N, 1989, Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi, V27, P965
[6]  
LIVADITIS GJ, 1990, J PROSTHET DENT, V56, P181
[7]   EXPERIENCES WITH RESIN-BONDED BRIDGES AND SPLINTS - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY [J].
MARINELLO, CP ;
KERSCHBAUM, T ;
HEINENBERG, B ;
HINZ, R ;
PETERS, S ;
PFEIFFER, P ;
REPPEL, PD ;
SCHWICKERATH, H .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1987, 14 (03) :251-260
[8]   Influence of surface treatment on adherence energy of alloys used in bonded prosthetics [J].
Moulin, P ;
Degrange, M ;
Picard, B .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1999, 26 (05) :413-421
[9]   A CRITIQUE OF BOND STRENGTH MEASUREMENTS [J].
VANNOORT, R ;
NOROOZI, S ;
HOWARD, IC ;
CARDEW, G .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1989, 17 (02) :61-67
[10]  
Wiltshire W A, 1986, Quintessence Dent Technol, V10, P227