Should punch biopsies be used when high-grade disease is suspected at initial colposcopic assessment? A prospective study

被引:45
作者
Byrom, J
Douce, G
Jones, PW
Tucker, H
Millinship, J
Dhar, K
Redman, CWE
机构
[1] Univ Hosp N Staffordshire, Colposcopy Clin, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
[2] Univ Hosp N Staffordshire, Pathol Dept, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
[3] Keele Univ, Dept Math, Keele, Staffs, England
关键词
colposcopy; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; punch biopsy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00344.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The reliability and applicability of colposcopically directed cervical punch biopsy was assessed in a sample of 170 paired punch and large loop excision of cervical transformation zone (LLETZ) specimens obtained from previously untreated women who had been selected for treatment on the basis of cytology and/or colposcopic findings and in whom the entire cervical transformation zone was visible. A single punch biopsy was taken immediately before the LLETZ, and all the specimens were reviewed by a single pathologist. Nine (5.3%) punch biopsies were inadequate. In terms of whether or not there was cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), the chance-corrected kappa analysis rated overall agreement as poor (kappa = 0.21, 95% confidence limits 0.02-0.39), whereas in terms of histologic grade, it was fair to moderate (kappa = 0.32, 95% confidence limits 0.23-0.42). Punch biopsy tended to underestimate the disease. The sensitivity and specificity of colposcopically directed punch biopsy for the detection of high-grade CIN was 74% and 91%, respectively, with positive- and negative predictive values of 97% and 48%, respectively. Two microinvasive and two intraepithelial glandular lesions were missed on punch biopsy. Punch biopsy should be avoided when high-grade disease is suspected.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 256
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Altman D, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P404
  • [2] BENEDET JL, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V65, P557
  • [3] BONARDI R, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V80, P1020
  • [4] COLPOSCOPICALLY DIRECTED PUNCH BIOPSY - A POTENTIALLY MISLEADING INVESTIGATION
    BUXTON, EJ
    LUESLEY, DM
    SHAFI, MI
    ROLLASON, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (12): : 1273 - 1276
  • [5] CONSISTENCY IN HISTOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF EPITHELIAL ABNORMALITIES OF CERVIX UTERI
    COCKER, J
    FOX, H
    LANGLEY, FA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1968, 21 (01) : 67 - &
  • [6] IS LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE TRANSFORMATION ZONE (LLETZ) MORE ACCURATE THAN COLPOSCOPICALLY DIRECTED PUNCH BIOPSY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    HOWE, DT
    VINCENTI, AC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (06): : 588 - 591
  • [7] OBSERVER VARIATION IN HISTOPATHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS AND GRADING OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    ISMAIL, SM
    COLCLOUGH, AB
    DINNEN, JS
    EAKINS, D
    EVANS, DMD
    GRADWELL, E
    OSULLIVAN, JP
    SUMMERELL, JM
    NEWCOMBE, RG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 298 (6675) : 707 - 710
  • [8] LUESLEY D, 1996, NHSCSP PUBLICATION, V2
  • [9] OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN HISTOPATHOLOGICAL REPORTING OF CERVICAL BIOPSY SPECIMENS
    ROBERTSON, AJ
    ANDERSON, JM
    BECK, JS
    BURNETT, RA
    HOWATSON, SR
    LEE, FD
    LESSELLS, AM
    MCLAREN, KM
    MOSS, SM
    SIMPSON, JG
    SMITH, GD
    TAVADIA, HB
    WALKER, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1989, 42 (03) : 231 - 238
  • [10] SHEHAN M, 1990, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V97, P811