Opinion formation and distribution in a bounded-confidence model on various networks

被引:43
作者
Meng, X. Flora [1 ,2 ]
Van Gorder, Robert A. [1 ]
Porter, Mason A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Math Inst, Oxford OX2 6GG, England
[2] MIT, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Univ Oxford, CABDyN Complex Ctr, Oxford OX1 1HP, England
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Math, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
SOCIAL POWER; DYNAMICS; CONSENSUS; EVOLUTION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevE.97.022312
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
In the social, behavioral, and economic sciences, it is important to predict which individual opinions eventually dominate in a large population, whether there will be a consensus, and how long it takes for a consensus to form. Such ideas have been studied heavily both in physics and in other disciplines, and the answers depend strongly both on how one models opinions and on the network structure on which opinions evolve. One model that was created to study consensus formation quantitatively is the Deffuant model, in which the opinion distribution of a population evolves via sequential random pairwise encounters. To consider heterogeneity of interactions in a population along with social influence, we study the Deffuant model on various network structures (deterministic synthetic networks, random synthetic networks, and social networks constructed from Facebook data). We numerically simulate the Deffuant model and conduct regression analyses to investigate the dependence of the time to reach steady states on various model parameters, including a confidence bound for opinion updates, the number of participating entities, and their willingness to compromise. We find that network structure and parameter values both have important effects on the convergence time and the number of steady-state opinion groups. For some network architectures, we observe that the relationship between the convergence time and model parameters undergoes a transition at a critical value of the confidence bound. For some networks, the steady-state opinion distribution also changes from consensus to multiple opinion groups at this critical value.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Opinion Dynamics and Learning in Social Networks [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Ozdaglar, Asuman .
DYNAMIC GAMES AND APPLICATIONS, 2011, 1 (01) :3-49
[2]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[3]  
Alaali Alya, 2008, 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Workshops, P394, DOI 10.1109/WIIAT.2008.377
[4]   The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the relative agreement opinion dynamics [J].
Amblard, F ;
Deffuant, G .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2004, 343 :725-738
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Handbook of Game Theory
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Scholarpedia, DOI DOI 10.4249/SCHOLARPEDIA.1739
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, J ARTIF SOC SOC SIMU
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SIAM J. Discrete Math, DOI DOI 10.1137/0401033
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Not. Am. Math. Soc
[10]   Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes [J].
Ben-Naim, E ;
Krapivsky, PL ;
Redner, S .
PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA, 2003, 183 (3-4) :190-204