Deriving stable multi-parametric MRI radiomic signatures in the presence of inter-scanner variations: survival prediction of glioblastoma via imaging pattern analysis and machine learning techniques

被引:7
作者
Rathore, Saima [1 ,2 ]
Bakas, Spyridon [1 ,2 ]
Akbari, Hamed [1 ,2 ]
Shukla, Gaurav [1 ,3 ]
Rozycki, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Davatzikos, Christos [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, CBICA, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS | 2018年 / 10575卷
关键词
Glioblastoma; Survival Prediction; Radiomics; Multi-institutional; PATIENT SURVIVAL; HETEROGENEITY; SUBTYPES;
D O I
10.1117/12.2293661
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
There is mounting evidence that assessment of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) profiles can non invasively predict survival in many cancers, including glioblastoma. The clinical adoption of mpMRI as a prognostic biomarker, however, depends on its applicability in a multicenter setting, which is hampered by inter-scanner variations. This concept has not been addressed in existing studies. We developed a comprehensive set of within-patient normalized tumor features such as intensity profile, shape, volume, and tumor location, extracted from multicenter mpMRI of two large (n(patients)=353) cohorts, comprising the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (HUP, n(patients)=252, n(scanners)=3) and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA, n(patients)=10 1, n(patients)=8). Inter-scanner harmonization was conducted by normalizing the tumor intensity profile, with that of the contralateral healthy tissue. The extracted features were integrated by support vector machines to derive survival predictors. The predictors' generalizability was evaluated within each cohort, by two cross-validation configurations: i) pooled/scanner-agnostic, and ii) across scanners (training in multiple scanners and testing in one). The median survival in each configuration was used as a cut-off to divide patients in long- and short-survivors. Accuracy (ACC) for predicting long- versus short-survivors, for these configurations was ACC(pooled)=79.06% and ACC(pooled)=84.7%, ACC(across)=73.55% and ACC(across)=74.76%, in HUP and TCIA datasets, respectively. The hazard ratio at 95% confidence interval was 3.87 (2.87-5.20, P<0.001) and 6.65 (3.57-12.36, P<0.001) for HUP and TCIA datasets, respectively. Our findings suggest that adequate data normalization coupled with machine learning classification allows robust prediction of survival estimates on mpMRI acquired by multiple scanners.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Molecular and cellular heterogeneity: the hallmark of glioblastoma [J].
Aum, Diane J. ;
Kim, David H. ;
Beaumont, Thomas L. ;
Leuthardt, Eric C. ;
Dunn, Gavin P. ;
Kim, Albert H. .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2014, 37 (06)
[2]  
Bakas S, 2017, NEURO-ONCOLOGY, V19, P151
[3]   Data Descriptor: Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features [J].
Bakas, Spyridon ;
Akbari, Hamed ;
Sotiras, Aristeidis ;
Bilello, Michel ;
Rozycki, Martin ;
Kirby, Justin S. ;
Freymann, John B. ;
Farahani, Keyvan ;
Davatzikos, Christos .
SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2017, 4
[4]  
Bakas Spyridon, 2016, Brainlesion, V9556, P144, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-30858-6_1, 10.1007/978-3-319-30858-6_13]
[5]   Population-based MRI atlases of spatial distribution are specific to patient and tumor characteristics in glioblastoma [J].
Bilello, Michel ;
Akbari, Hamed ;
Da, Xiao ;
Pisapia, Jared M. ;
Mohan, Suyash ;
Wolf, Ronald L. ;
O'Rourke, Donald M. ;
Martinez-Lage, Maria ;
Davatzikos, Christos .
NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2016, 12 :34-40
[6]   Association of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI: Comparison of intraindividually matched T1- and T2*-based bolus techniques [J].
Bonekamp, David ;
Deike, Katerina ;
Wiestler, Benedikt ;
Wick, Wolfgang ;
Bendszus, Martin ;
Radbruch, Alexander ;
Heiland, Sabine .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (01) :87-96
[7]   LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines [J].
Chang, Chih-Chung ;
Lin, Chih-Jen .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 2 (03)
[8]   Cancer imaging phenomics toolkit: quantitative imaging analytics for precision diagnostics and predictive modeling of clinical outcome [J].
Davatzikos, Christos ;
Rathore, Saima ;
Bakas, Spyridon ;
Pati, Sarthak ;
Bergman, Mark ;
Kalarot, Ratheesh ;
Sridharan, Patmaa ;
Gastounioti, Aimilia ;
Jahani, Nariman ;
Cohen, Eric ;
Akbari, Hamed ;
Tunc, Birkan ;
Doshi, Jimit ;
Parker, Drew ;
Hsieh, Michael ;
Sotiras, Aristeidis ;
Li, Hongming ;
Ou, Yangming ;
Doot, Robert K. ;
Bilello, Michel ;
Fan, Yong ;
Shinohara, Russell T. ;
Yushkevich, Paul ;
Verma, Ragini ;
Kontos, Despina .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 5 (01)
[9]   GLISTR: Glioma Image Segmentation and Registration [J].
Gooya, Ali ;
Pohl, Kilian M. ;
Bilello, Michel ;
Cirillo, Luigi ;
Biros, George ;
Melhem, Elias R. ;
Davatzikos, Christos .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 31 (10) :1941-1954
[10]   MR Imaging Predictors of Molecular Profile and Survival: Multi-institutional Study of the TCGA Glioblastoma Data Set [J].
Gutman, David A. ;
Cooper, Lee A. D. ;
Hwang, Scott N. ;
Holder, Chad A. ;
Gao, JingJing ;
Aurora, Tarun D. ;
Dunn, William D., Jr. ;
Scarpace, Lisa ;
Mikkelsen, Tom ;
Jain, Rajan ;
Wintermark, Max ;
Jilwan, Manal ;
Raghavan, Prashant ;
Huang, Erich ;
Clifford, Robert J. ;
Mongkolwat, Pattanasak ;
Kleper, Vladimir ;
Freymann, John ;
Kirby, Justin ;
Zinn, Pascal O. ;
Moreno, Carlos S. ;
Jaffe, Carl ;
Colen, Rivka ;
Rubin, Daniel L. ;
Saltz, Joel ;
Flanders, Adam ;
Brat, Daniel J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (02) :560-569