Efficacy of Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in Calves Within Experimental Infection Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:6
作者
Martinez, David A. A. [1 ]
Newcomer, Benjamin [2 ]
Passler, Thomas [1 ]
Chamorro, Manuel F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] West Texas A&M Univ, Coll Vet Med & Biomed Sci, Dept Large Anim Clin Sci, Canyon, TX USA
关键词
BRSV challenge; respiratory disease; vaccination efficacy; calves; morbidity and mortality; VIRAL DIARRHEA VIRUS; MODIFIED-LIVE; INTRANASAL VACCINATION; INACTIVATED VACCINE; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; DISEASE; HERPESVIRUS; PNEUMONIA; CATTLE;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2022.906636
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Producers and veterinarians commonly use vaccination as the main strategy to reduce the incidence of bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) infection in calves; however, supportive evidence of BRSV vaccination efficacy has been inconsistent in the literature. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate data from controlled studies on the efficacy of commercially available BRSV vaccines on reducing calf morbidity and mortality after experimental infection with BRSV. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in BRSV experimental challenge studies that reported the efficacy of commercially available modified-live virus (MLV) and inactivated BRSV vaccines on protection against calf morbidity and mortality. The studies included in the analysis were randomized, controlled, clinical trials with clear definitions of calf morbidity and mortality. Risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals and forest plots were generated. Fourteen studies including 29 trials were selected for the analysis. Commercially available MLV BRSV vaccines reduced the risk of calf mortality after experimental infection with BRSV. Modified-live virus vaccines reduced the risk of morbidity in calves with absence of serum maternal antibodies at initial vaccination, but failed to demonstrate significant morbidity reduction when calves were vaccinated in the face of maternal immunity. Results from experimental challenge studies do not always represent the conditions of natural infection and caution should be used when making vaccine recommendations.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of commercially available vaccines against bovine herpesvirus, bovine viral diarrhea virus, bovine respiratory syncytial virus, and parainfluenza type 3 virus for mitigation of bovine respiratory disease complex in cattle
    Theurer, Miles E.
    Larson, Robert L.
    White, Brad J.
    [J]. JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 246 (01): : 126 - 142
  • [22] A single vaccination with an inactivated bovine respiratory syncytial virus vaccine primes the cellular immune response in calves with maternal antibody
    van der Sluijs, Mirjam T. W.
    Kuhn, Eva M.
    Makoschey, Birgit
    [J]. BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2010, 6
  • [23] Efficacy of a modified live intranasal bovine respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in 3-week-old calves experimentally challenged with BRSV
    Vangeel, Ilse
    Antonis, Adriaan F. G.
    Fluess, Manuela
    Riegler, Lutz
    Peters, Andy R.
    Harmeyer, Silke S.
    [J]. VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 174 (03) : 627 - 635
  • [24] West K, 1997, CAN J VET RES, V61, P28
  • [25] The effect of formalin-inactivated vaccine on respiratory disease associated with bovine respiratory syncytial virus infection in calves
    West, K
    Petrie, L
    Haines, DM
    Konoby, C
    Clark, EG
    Martin, K
    Ellis, JA
    [J]. VACCINE, 1999, 17 (7-8) : 809 - 820
  • [26] Immunogenicity of a modified-live virus vaccine against bovine viral diarrhea virus types 1 and 2, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus, bovine parainfluenza-3 virus, and bovine respiratory syncytial virus when administered intranasally in young calves
    Xue, Wenzhi
    Ellis, John
    Mattick, Debra
    Smith, Linda
    Brady, Ryan
    Trigo, Emilio
    [J]. VACCINE, 2010, 28 (22) : 3784 - 3792