Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses

被引:82
作者
Chen, Baoguo [1 ]
Ning, Aihua [1 ]
Bi, Hongyan [2 ]
Dunlap, Susan [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Beijing Key Lab Appl Expt Psychol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Learning Res & Dev, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
subject-relative clause; object-relative clause; working memory; Chinese;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.04.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper presents an experiment that compared high and low working memory span readers' abilities to process Chinese subject-relative and object-relative clause structures in a self-paced reading paradigm. Comprehension performance results indicated that the object-relative structure was easier to understand than the subject-relative structure. Reading time results showed that participants with low working memory span read the subject-relative structures more slowly than the object-relative structures, but there was no reading time difference for the high working memory span participants. The experiment provides further evidence that the Chinese subject-relative clause structure is more difficult to process than the Chinese object-relative clause structure. especially for low working memory span individuals. Furthermore, these results support a syntactic storage account of the observed complexity difference. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 65
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Online syntactic storage costs in sentence comprehension [J].
Chen, E ;
Gibson, E ;
Wolf, F .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2005, 52 (01) :144-169
[2]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND READING [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (04) :450-466
[3]   The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension: Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources [J].
Fedorenko, E ;
Gibson, E ;
Rohde, D .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2006, 54 (04) :541-553
[4]  
Gibson E, 2000, IMAGE, LANGUAGE, BRAIN, P95
[5]   Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies [J].
Gibson, E .
COGNITION, 1998, 68 (01) :1-76
[6]   Constraints on sentence comprehension [J].
Gibson, E ;
Pearlmutter, NJ .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1998, 2 (07) :262-268
[7]   Memory-load interference in syntactic processing [J].
Gordon, PC ;
Hendrick, R ;
Levine, WH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (05) :425-430
[8]   Memory interference during language processing [J].
Gordon, PC ;
Hendrick, R ;
Johnson, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (06) :1411-1423
[9]   Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading [J].
Gordon, Peter C. ;
Hendrick, Randall ;
Johnson, Marcus ;
Lee, Yoonhyoung .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2006, 32 (06) :1304-1321
[10]   Processing relative clauses in Chinese [J].
Hsiao, F ;
Gibson, E .
COGNITION, 2003, 90 (01) :3-27