Assessment of the variation in CT scanner performance (image quality and Hounsfield units) with scan parameters, for image optimisation in radiotherapy treatment planning

被引:45
作者
Davis, Anne T. [1 ,2 ]
Palmer, Antony L. [1 ,2 ]
Pani, Silvia [1 ]
Nisbet, Andrew [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Dept Phys, Guildford, Surrey, England
[2] Portsmouth Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Med Phys, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[3] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Med Phys, Guildford, Surrey, England
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2018年 / 45卷
关键词
Radiotherapy; CT; Imaging; Optimisation; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DELINEATION; ASSURANCE; VARIABILITY; SIMULATION; CONVERSION; ONCOLOGY; TARGET; BREAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.11.036
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To define a method and investigate how the adjustment of scan parameters affected the image quality and Hounsfield units (HUs) on a CT scanner used for radiotherapy treatment planning. A lack of similar investigations in the literature may be a contributing factor in the apparent reluctance to optimise radiotherapy CT protocols.& para;& para;Method: A Catphan phantom was used to assess how image quality on a Toshiba Aquilion LB scanner changed with scan parameters. Acquisition and reconstruction field-of-view (FOV), collimation, image slice thickness, effective mAs per rotation and reconstruction algorithm were varied. Changes were assessed for HUs of different materials, high contrast spatial resolution (HCSR), contrast-noise ratio (CNR), HU uniformity, scan direction low contrast and CT dose-index.& para;& para;Results: CNR and HCSR varied most with reconstruction algorithm, reconstruction FOV and effective mAs. Collimation, but not image slice width, had a significant effect on CT dose-index with narrower collimation giving higher doses. Dose increased with effective mAs. Highest HU differences were seen when changing reconstruction algorithm: 56 HU for densities close to water and 117 HU for bone-like materials. Acquisition FOV affected the HUs but reconstruction FOV and effective mAs did not.& para;& para;Conclusions: All the scan parameters investigated affected the image quality metrics. Reconstruction algorithm, reconstruction FOV, collimation and effective mAs were most important. Reconstruction algorithm and acquisition FOV had significant effect on HU. The methodology is applicable to radiotherapy CT scanners when investigating image quality optimisation, prior to assessing the impact of scan protocol changes on clinical CT images and treatment plans.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 64
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [11] CT-ED conversion on a GE Lightspeed-RT scanner: influence of scanner settings
    Ebert, M. A.
    Lambert, J.
    Greer, P. B.
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2008, 31 (02) : 154 - 159
  • [12] Edyvean S., 2003, 32 IPEM
  • [13] ESTRO, QUAL ASS TREATM PLAN
  • [14] American Association of Physicists in Medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53: Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning
    Fraass, B
    Doppke, K
    Hunt, M
    Kutcher, G
    Starkschall, G
    Stern, R
    Van Dyke, J
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) : 1773 - 1829
  • [15] Principles of CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality
    Goldman, Lee W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 35 (04) : 213 - 225
  • [16] Dose calculation accuracy using cone-beam CT (CBCT) for pelvic adaptive radiotherapy
    Guan, Huaiqun
    Dong, Hang
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (20) : 6239 - 6250
  • [17] Cone beam computerized tomography: the effect of calibration of the Hounsfield unit number to electron density on dose calculation accuracy for adaptive radiation therapy
    Hatton, Joan
    McCurdy, Boyd
    Greer, Peter B.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (15) : N329 - N346
  • [18] Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast
    Hurkmans, CW
    Borger, JH
    Pieters, BR
    Russell, NS
    Jansen, EPM
    Mijnheer, BJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (05): : 1366 - 1372
  • [19] ImPACT, 2004, 04045 IMPACT MHRA
  • [20] International Atomic Energy Agency, 2012, Quality Assurance Programme for Computed Tomography: Diagnostic and Therapy Applications, IAEA