Mobility of Vulnerable Elders (MOVE): study protocol to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of a mobility intervention in long-term care facilities

被引:28
作者
Slaughter, Susan E. [1 ]
Estabrooks, Carole A. [1 ]
Jones, C. Allyson [2 ]
Wagg, Adrian S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Fac Rehabil Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MINIMUM DATA SET; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SIT-TO-STAND; COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE SCALE; NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; INCONTINENCE CARE; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2318-11-84
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: Almost 90% of residents living in long-term care facilities have limited mobility which is associated with a loss of ability in activities of daily living, falls, increased risk of serious medical problems such as pressure ulcers, incontinence and a significant decline in health-related quality of life. For health workers caring for residents it may also increase the risk of injury. The effectiveness of rehabilitation to facilitate mobility has been studied with dedicated research assistants or extensively trained staff caregivers; however, few investigators have examined the effectiveness of techniques to encourage mobility by usual caregivers in long-term care facilities. Methods/Design: This longitudinal, quasi-experimental study is designed to demonstrate the effect of the sit-to-stand activity carried out by residents in the context of daily care with health care aides. In three intervention facilities health care aides will prompt residents to repeat the sit-to-stand action on two separate occasions during each day and each evening shift as part of daily care routines. In three control facilities residents will receive usual care. Intervention and control facilities are matched on the ownership model (public, private for-profit, voluntary not-for-profit) and facility size. The dose of the mobility intervention is assessed through the use of daily documentation flowsheets in the health record. Resident outcome measures include: 1) the 30-second sit-to-stand test; 2) the Functional Independence Measure; 3) the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3; and, 4) the Quality of Life Alzheimer's Disease. Discussion: There are several compelling reasons for this study: the widespread prevalence of limited mobility in this population; the rapid decline in mobility after admission to a long-term care facility; the importance of mobility to quality of life; the increased time (and therefore cost) required to care for residents with limited mobility; and, the increased risk of injury for health workers caring for residents who are unable to stand. The importance of these issues is magnified when considering the increasing number of people living in long-term care facilities and an aging population.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 109 条
  • [1] DO FOR-PROFIT AND NOT-FOR-PROFIT NURSING-HOMES BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY
    AARONSON, WE
    ZINN, JS
    ROSKO, MD
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 1994, 34 (06) : 775 - 786
  • [2] The impact of somatic and cognitive disorders on the functional status of the elderly
    Agüero-Torres, H
    Thomas, VS
    Winblad, B
    Fratiglioni, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (10) : 1007 - 1012
  • [3] Work-related injury among direct care occupations in British Columbia, Canada
    Alamgir, H.
    Cvitkovich, Y.
    Yu, S.
    Yassi, A.
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2007, 64 (11) : 769 - 775
  • [4] A randomized trial of a combined physical activity and environmental intervention in nursing home residents: Do sleep and agitation improve?
    Alessi, CA
    Yoon, EJ
    Schnelle, JF
    Al-Samarrai, NR
    Cruise, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1999, 47 (07) : 784 - 791
  • [5] Health Utilities Index Mark 3 showed valid in Alzheimer disease, arthritis, and cataracts
    Asakawa, Keiko
    Rolfson, Darryl
    Senthilselvan, Ambikaipakan
    Feeny, David
    Johnson, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (07) : 733 - 739
  • [6] The effects of staffing on in-bed times of nursing home residents
    Bates-Jensen, BM
    Schnelle, JF
    Alessi, CA
    Al-Samarrai, NR
    Levy-Storms, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (06) : 931 - 938
  • [7] Improving dressing behavior cognitively impaired nursing home residents
    Beck, C
    Heacock, P
    Mercer, SO
    Walls, RC
    Rapp, CG
    Vogelpohl, TS
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 1997, 46 (03) : 126 - 132
  • [8] The meaning of mobility for residents and staff in long-term care facilities
    Bourret, EM
    Bernick, LG
    Cott, CA
    Kontos, PC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2002, 37 (04) : 338 - 345
  • [9] Correlates of care quality in long-term care facilities: A multilevel analysis
    Bravo, G
    De Wals, P
    Dubois, MF
    Charpentier, M
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1999, 54 (03): : P180 - P188
  • [10] An exploratory randomized controlled trial of assisted practice for improving sit-to-stand in stroke patients in the hospital setting
    Britton, Elizabeth
    Harris, Nigel
    Turton, Ailie
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 22 (05) : 458 - 468