How Should we Use Multicolumn Spinal Cord Stimulation to Optimize Back Pain Spatial Neural Targeting? A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial (ESTIMETStudy)

被引:37
作者
Rigoard, Philippe [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Billot, Maxime [1 ]
Ingrand, Pierre [4 ]
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle [5 ]
Roulaud, Manuel [1 ]
Peruzzi, Philippe [6 ]
Dam Hieu, Phong [7 ]
Voirin, Jimmy [8 ]
Raoul, Sylvie [9 ]
Page, Philippe [2 ]
Djian, Marie-Christine [10 ]
Fontaine, Denys [11 ,12 ]
Lanteri-Minet, Michel [12 ,13 ,14 ]
Blond, Serge [15 ]
Buisset, Nadia [15 ]
Cuny, Emmanuel [16 ]
Cadenne, Myriam [17 ]
Caire, Francois [18 ]
Ranoux, Daniele [19 ]
Mertens, Patrick [20 ]
Naous, Hussein [20 ]
Simon, Emile [20 ]
Emery, Evelyne [21 ]
Beraud, Guillaume [22 ]
Debiais, Francoise [23 ]
Durand, Geraldine [23 ]
Serrie, Alain [24 ]
Diallo, Bakari [25 ]
Bulsei, Julie [5 ]
Ounajim, Amine [1 ]
Nivole, Kevin [1 ]
Duranton, Sophie [26 ]
Naiditch, Nicolas [1 ]
Monlezun, Olivier [1 ]
Bataille, Benoit [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Poitiers Hosp, PRISMATICS Lab Predict Res Spine Neurostimulat Ma, Poitiers, France
[2] Univ Poitiers Hosp, Spine & Neurostimulat Unit, Dept Neurosurg, Poitiers, France
[3] CNRS, P Inst, UPR 3346, Futuroscope,Fac Sci, Poitiers, France
[4] Univ Poitiers Hosp, Fac Med & Pharm, Poitiers, France
[5] Hop Hotel Dieu, Clin Res Unit Econ, Paris, France
[6] Reims Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Reims, France
[7] Brest Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Brest, France
[8] Colmar Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Colmar, France
[9] Nantes Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Nantes, France
[10] Foch Hosp, Pain Evaluat & Treatment Ctr, Suresnes, France
[11] Univ Cote Azur, CHU Nice, Dept Neurosurg, Nice, France
[12] Cote Azur Univ, FHU InovPain, Nice, France
[13] Nice Univ Hosp, Pain Evaluat & Treatment Ctr, Nice, France
[14] Auvergne Univ, INSERM, Neuro Dol, U1107,Trigeminal Pain & Migraine, Clermont Ferrand, France
[15] Lille Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Lille, France
[16] Bordeaux Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Bordeaux, France
[17] Bordeaux Univ Hosp, Pain Evaluat & Treatment Ctr, Bordeaux, France
[18] Limoges Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Limoges, France
[19] Limoges Univ Hosp, Pain Evaluat & Treatment Ctr, Limoges, France
[20] Lyon Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Lyon, France
[21] Caen Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Caen, France
[22] Univ Poitiers Hosp, Internal Med Infect & Trop Dis Dept, Poitiers, France
[23] Univ Poitiers Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Poitiers, France
[24] Lariboisiere Hosp, Pain Evaluat & Treatment Ctr, Paris, France
[25] Univ Poitiers Hosp, Pain Evaluat & Treatment Ctr, Poitiers, France
[26] Univ Poitiers Hosp, Vigilance Dept, Clin Res Direct, Poitiers, France
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2021年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Back pain; failed back surgery syndrome; multicolumn SCS; neural targeting; randomized controlled trial; spinal cord stimulation; sweet spot; CONVENTIONAL MEDICAL-MANAGEMENT; SURGERY SYNDROME; PARESTHESIA COVERAGE; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; LEAD; DESIGN; IMPACT; TREAT;
D O I
10.1111/ner.13251
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Recent studies have highlighted multicolumn spinal cord stimulation (SCS) efficacy, hypothesizing that optimized spatial neural targeting provided by new-generation SCS lead design or its multicolumn programming abilities could represent an opportunity to better address chronic back pain (BP). Objective To compare multicolumn vs. monocolumn programming on clinical outcomes of refractory postoperative chronic BP patients implanted with SCS using multicolumn surgical lead. Materials and Methods Twelve centers included 115 patients in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. After randomization, leads were programmed using only one or several columns. The primary outcome was change in BP visual analogic scale (VAS) at six months. All patients were then programmed using the full potential of the lead up until 12-months follow-up. Results At six months, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes whether the SCS was programmed using a mono or a multicolumn program. At 12 months, in all patients having been receiving multicolumn SCS for at least six months (n= 97), VAS decreases were significant for global pain (45.1%), leg pain (55.8%), and BP (41.5%) compared with baseline (p < 0.0001). Conclusion The ESTIMET study confirms the significant benefit experienced on chronic BP by patients implanted with multicolumn SCS, independently from multicolumn lead programming. These good clinical outcomes might result from the specific architecture of the multicolumn lead, giving the opportunity to select initially the best column on a multicolumn grid and to optimize neural targeting with low-energy requirements. However, involving more columns than one does not appear necessary, once initial spatial targeting of the "sweet spot" has been achieved. Our findings suggest that this spatial concept could also be transposed to cylindrical leads, which have drastically improved their capability to shape the electrical field, and might be combined with temporal resolution using SCS new modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 101
页数:16
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Inconsistent Definitions for Intention-To-Treat in Relation to Missing Outcome Data: Systematic Review of the Methods Literature [J].
Alshurafa, Mohamad ;
Briel, Matthias ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Haines, Ted ;
Moayyedi, Paul ;
Gentles, Stephen J. ;
Rios, Lorena ;
Tran, Chau ;
Bhatnagar, Neera ;
Lamontagne, Francois ;
Walter, Stephen D. ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, CLASSIFICATION CHRON
[3]   Is Spinal Cord Stimulation Safe? A Review of its Complications [J].
Bendersky, Damian ;
Yampolsky, Claudio .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 82 (06) :1359-1368
[4]   From "mechanical" to "neuropathic" back pain concept in FBSS patients. A systematic review based on factors leading to the chronification of pain (part C) [J].
Blond, S. ;
Mertens, P. ;
David, R. ;
Roulaud, M. ;
Rigoard, P. .
NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2015, 61 :S45-S56
[5]   Secondary endpoints can be validly analyzed, even if the primary endpoint does not provide clear statistical significance [J].
Davis, CE .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1997, 18 (06) :557-560
[6]   Predictors of Spinal Cord Stimulation Success [J].
De La Cruz, Priscilla ;
Fama, Christopher ;
Roth, Steven ;
Haller, Jessica ;
Wilock, Meghan ;
Lange, Steven ;
Pilitsis, Julie .
NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (07) :599-602
[7]   Mimicking the brain: evaluation of St Jude Medical's Prodigy Chronic Pain System with Burst Technology [J].
De Ridder, Dirk ;
Vanneste, Sven ;
Plazier, Mark ;
Vancamp, Tim .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (02) :143-150
[8]   A Systematic Literature Review of Spine Neurostimulation Therapies for the Treatment of Pain [J].
Deer, Timothy R. ;
Grider, Jay S. ;
Lamer, Tim J. ;
Pope, Jason E. ;
Falowski, Steven ;
Hunter, Corey W. ;
Provenzano, David A. ;
Slavin, Konstantin, V ;
Russo, Marc ;
Carayannopoulos, Alexios ;
Shah, Jay M. ;
Harned, Michael E. ;
Hagedorn, Jonathan M. ;
Bolash, Robert B. ;
Arle, Jeff E. ;
Kapural, Leo ;
Amirdelfan, Kasra ;
Jain, Sameer ;
Liem, Liong ;
Carlson, Jonathan D. ;
Malinowski, Mark N. ;
Bendel, Markus ;
Yang, Ajax ;
Aiyer, Rohit ;
Valimahomed, Ali ;
Antony, Ajay ;
Craig, Justin ;
Fishman, Michael A. ;
Al-Kaisy, Adnan A. ;
Christelis, Nick ;
Rosenquist, Richard W. ;
Levy, Robert M. ;
Mekhail, Nagy .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (07) :1421-1432
[9]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo/sham controlled randomised trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain [J].
Duarte, Rui, V ;
Nevitt, Sarah ;
McNicol, Ewan ;
Taylor, Rod S. ;
Buchser, Eric ;
North, Richard B. ;
Eldabe, Sam .
PAIN, 2020, 161 (01) :24-35
[10]  
Gallizzi Michael, 2008, Pain Pract, V8, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00163.x