A Methodology Combining Optimization and Simulation for Real Applications of the Stochastic Aircraft Recovery Problem

被引:10
作者
Arias, Pol [1 ]
Guimarans, Daniel [2 ]
Mota, Miguel Mujica [1 ,3 ]
Boosten, Geert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Telecommun & Syst Engn, Sabadell, Spain
[2] NICTA, Optimisat Res Grp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Amsterdam Univ Appl Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
2013 8TH EUROSIM CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (EUROSIM) | 2013年
关键词
Programming; flight schedule; disruption; simulation; robustness; optimization; Aircraft Recovery Problem; DECISION-SUPPORT FRAMEWORK; SCHEDULE PERTURBATION; OPERATIONAL RELIABILITY; AIRLINE NETWORK; DELAYS; ROUTINGS;
D O I
10.1109/EUROSIM.2013.55
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The Aircraft Recovery Problem appears when external events cause disruptions in a flight schedule. Thus in order to minimize the losses caused by the externalities, aircrafts must be reallocated (rescheduled) in the best possible way. The aim of this paper is to develop a suitable methodology that combines optimization techniques with a simulation approach to tackle the so-called Stochastic Aircraft Recovery Problem. The approach solves the problem through the rescheduling of the flight plan using delays, swaps, and cancellations. The main objective of the optimization model is to restore as much as possible the original flight schedule, minimizing the total delay and the number of cancelled flights. By applying simulation techniques, the robustness of the given solution is assessed. The proposed methodology is applied on a medium-sized scenario based on real data provided by a commercial airline. The obtained results show that the methodology described in the paper is capable of producing a feasible and robust solution for this problem.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 270
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Apt K.R., 2007, CONSTRAINT LOGIC PRO
  • [2] A GRASP for aircraft routing in response to groundings and delays
    Arguello, MF
    Bard, JF
    Yu, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 1 (03) : 211 - 228
  • [3] Arora S, 2009, COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY: A MODERN APPROACH, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511804090
  • [4] Optimizing aircraft routings in response to groundings and delays
    Bard, JF
    Yu, G
    Argüello, MF
    [J]. IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2001, 33 (10) : 931 - 947
  • [5] Bessiere C, 2006, FOUND ARTIF INTELL, P29
  • [6] Disruption management in the airline industry-Concepts, models and methods
    Clausen, Jens
    Larsen, Allan
    Larsen, Jesper
    Rezanova, Natalia J.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 37 (05) : 809 - 821
  • [7] Robust Airline Schedule Planning: Minimizing Propagated Delay in an Integrated Routing and Crewing Framework
    Dunbar, Michelle
    Froyland, Gary
    Wu, Cheng-Lung
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 46 (02) : 204 - 216
  • [8] A DECISION-SUPPORT FRAMEWORK FOR AIRLINE FLIGHT CANCELLATIONS AND DELAYS
    JARRAH, AIZ
    YU, G
    KRISHNAMURTHY, N
    RAKSHIT, A
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 1993, 27 (03) : 266 - 280
  • [9] Kilby P., HDB CONSTRAINT PROGR, P801
  • [10] Planning for robust airline operations: Optimizing aircraft routings and flight departure times to minimize passenger disruptions
    Lan, S
    Clarke, JP
    Barnhart, C
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 2006, 40 (01) : 15 - 28