Performing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Off-Pump May Compromise Long-Term Survival in a Veteran Population

被引:37
作者
Bakaeen, Faisal G.
Chu, Danny
Kelly, Rosemary F.
Ward, Herbert B.
Jessen, Michael E.
Chen, G. John
Petersen, Nancy J.
Holman, William L.
机构
[1] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Baylor Coll Med, Michael E DeBakey Dept Surg, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Houston, TX USA
[2] St Lukes Episcopal Hosp, Texas Heart Inst, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[5] Houston Vet Affairs Hlth Serv Res & Dev Ctr Excel, Houston, TX USA
[6] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[7] Birmingham Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
ON-PUMP; REDUCE MORBIDITY; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; REVASCULARIZATION; MORTALITY; METAANALYSIS; PATENCY; STROKE; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.064
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. There are ample data regarding the short-term outcomes of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but little is known about the long-term survival associated with these approaches. Methods. Using the Veterans Affairs (VA) Continuous Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Program, we identified all VA patients (n = 65,097) who underwent primary isolated CABG from October 1997 to April 2011. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Age, 17 preoperative risk factors, and year of operation were used to calculate propensity scores for each patient. A greedy-match algorithm using the propensity scores matched 8,911 off-pump with 26,733 on-pump patients. Survival functions were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test. Results. In the complete cohort, off-pump was used in 11,629 of 65,097 (17.9%) operations. For the matched cohort, the median follow-up was 6.7 years (interquartile range, 3.72 to 9.35 years). Risk-adjusted mortality did not differ significantly between the off-pump and on-pump groups at 1 year (4.67% vs 4.78%; risk ratio [RR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88 to 1.09) or 3 years (9.21% vs 8.89%; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.12). However, risk-adjusted mortality was higher in the off-pump group at 5 years (14.47% vs 13.45%; RR, 1.08; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.15) and 10 years (25.18% vs 23.57%; RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.12). Overall, the hazard ratio for off-pump vs on-pump was 1.06 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.13; p = 0.04). Conclusions. Off-pump CABG may be associated with decreased long-term survival. Further studies are needed to identify the reasons behind this finding. (C) 2013 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1952 / 1960
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass versus off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass grafting: Does eliminating the pump reduce morbidity and cost? [J].
Bull, DA ;
Neumayer, LA ;
Stringham, JC ;
Meldrum, P ;
Affleck, DG ;
Karwande, SV .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 71 (01) :170-173
[2]   Off-pump coronary surgery: Effect on early mortality and stroke [J].
Cheng, W ;
Denton, TA ;
Fontana, GP ;
Raissi, S ;
Blanche, C ;
Kass, RM ;
Magliato, KE ;
Mirocha, J ;
Trento, A .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 124 (02) :313-320
[3]   On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Cohort of 63,000 Patients [J].
Chu, Danny ;
Bakaeen, Faisal G. ;
Dao, Tam K. ;
LeMaire, Scott A. ;
Coselli, Joseph S. ;
Huh, Joseph .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 87 (06) :1820-1827
[4]   Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity [J].
Cleveland, JC ;
Shroyer, ALW ;
Chen, AY ;
Peterson, E ;
Grover, FL .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (04) :1282-1288
[5]   Comparing Long-Term Survival Between Patients Undergoing Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Operations [J].
Filardo, Giovanni ;
Grayburn, Paul A. ;
Hamilton, Cody ;
Hebeler, Robert F., Jr. ;
Cooksey, William B. ;
Hamman, Baron .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 92 (02) :571-578
[6]   THE VETERANS AFFAIRS CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT IN CARDIAC-SURGERY STUDY [J].
GROVER, FL ;
JOHNSON, RR ;
SHROYER, ALW ;
MARSHALL, G ;
HAMMERMEISTER, KE .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1994, 58 (06) :1845-1851
[7]   Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Is Associated With Worse Arterial and Saphenous Vein Graft Patency and Less Effective Revascularization Results From the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Trial [J].
Hattler, Brack ;
Messenger, John C. ;
Shroyer, A. Laurie ;
Collins, Joseph F. ;
Haugen, Scott J. ;
Garcia, Joel A. ;
Baltz, Janet H. ;
Cleveland, Joseph C., Jr. ;
Novitzky, Dimitri ;
Grover, Frederick L. .
CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (23) :2827-2835
[8]   Aborted off-pump coronary artery bypass patients have much worse outcomes than on-pump or successful off-pump patients [J].
Jin, RY ;
Hiratzka, LF ;
Grunkemeier, GL ;
Krause, A ;
Page, US .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (09) :I332-I337
[9]   A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery [J].
Khan, NE ;
De Souza, A ;
Mister, R ;
Flather, M ;
Clague, J ;
Davies, S ;
Collins, P ;
Wang, DL ;
Sigwart, U ;
Pepper, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (01) :21-28
[10]   Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score analyses [J].
Kuss, Oliver ;
von Salviati, Benita ;
Boergermann, Jochen .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 140 (04) :829-U128