Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement - A prospective, randomised controlled study of the Acrobot system

被引:237
作者
Cobb, J [1 ]
Henckel, J [1 ]
Gomes, P [1 ]
Harris, S [1 ]
Jakopec, M [1 ]
Rodriguez y Baena, F [1 ]
Barrett, A [1 ]
Davies, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Charing Cross Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, London W6 8RF, England
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME | 2006年 / 88B卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.17220
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
We performed a prospective, randomised controlled trial of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty comparing the performance of the Acrobot system with conventional surgery. A total of 27 patients (28 knees) awaiting unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were randomly allocated to have the operation performed conventionally or with the assistance of the Acrobot. The primary outcome measurement was the angle of tibiofemoral alignment in the coronal plane, measured by CT. Other secondary parameters were evaluated and are reported. All of the Acrobot group had tibiofemoral alignment in the coronal plane within 2 degrees of the planned position, while only 40% of the conventional group achieved this level of accuracy. While the operations took longer, no adverse effects were noted, and there was a trend towards improvement in performance with increasing accuracy based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and American Knee Society scores at six weeks and three months. The Acrobot device allows the surgeon to reproduce a pre-operative plan more reliably than is possible using conventional techniques which may have clinical advantages.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 197
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement - A three to ten-year follow-up study
    Argenson, JNA
    Chevrol-Benkeddache, Y
    Aubaniac, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (12) : 2235 - 2239
  • [2] Bargar WL, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P82
  • [3] Alignment in total knee arthroplasty -: A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique
    Bäthis, H
    Perlick, L
    Tingart, M
    Lüring, C
    Zurakowski, D
    Grifka, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (05): : 682 - 687
  • [4] Accelerated recovery for unicompartmental knee replacement - a feasibility study
    Beard, DJ
    Murray, DW
    Rees, JL
    Price, AJ
    Dodd, CAF
    [J]. KNEE, 2002, 9 (03) : 221 - 224
  • [5] Bellamy N., 1988, J ORTHOP RHEUMATOL, V1, P95
  • [6] Berger RA, 1999, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P50
  • [7] Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery - 10-year minimum follow-up period
    Cartier, P
    Sanouiller, JL
    Grelsamer, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1996, 11 (07) : 782 - 788
  • [8] Clemens Ulrich, 2003, Surg Technol Int, V11, P265
  • [9] Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant
    Emerson, RH
    Hansborough, T
    Reitman, RA
    Rosenfeldt, W
    Higgins, LL
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (404) : 62 - 70
  • [10] THE OXFORD KNEE FOR UNICOMPARTMENTAL OSTEO-ARTHRITIS - THE 1ST 103 CASES
    GOODFELLOW, JW
    KERSHAW, CJ
    BENSON, MKD
    OCONNOR, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1988, 70 (05): : 692 - 701