Venous thrombosis risk assessment in medical inpatients: the medical inpatients and thrombosis (MITH) study

被引:41
|
作者
Zakai, N. A.
Callas, P. W.
Repp, A. B.
Cushman, M.
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Colchester 05446, Essex, England
[2] Fletcher Allen Hlth Care, Colchester, VT USA
关键词
deep venous thrombosis; medical patients; pulmonary embolism; risk score; venous thrombosis; DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINE; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN; THROMBOEMBOLISM PROPHYLAXIS; HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; VALIDATION; PREVENTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/jth.12147
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background We sought to define the risk factors present at admission for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in medical inpatients and develop a risk model for clinical use. Methods Between January 2002 and June 2009, 299 cases of hospital-acquired VTE were frequency matched to 601 controls. Records were abstracted using a standard form for characteristics of the thrombosis, medical conditions and other risk factors. Weighted logistic regression and survey methods were used to develop a risk model for hospital-acquired VTE that was validated by bootstrapping. Results VTE complicated 4.6 per 1000 admissions. Two risk assessment models were developed, one using laboratory data available at admission (Model 1) and the other excluding laboratory data (Model 2). Model 1 consisted of the following risk factors (points): history of congestive heart failure (5), history of inflammatory disease (4), fracture in the past 3months (3), history of VTE (2), history of cancer in the past 12months (1), tachycardia (2), respiratory dysfunction (1), white cell count 11x109/L (1), and platelet count 350x109/L (1). Model 2 was similar, except respiratory dysfunction had 2 points and white cell and platelet counts were removed. The c-statistic for Model 1 was 0.73 (95% CI 0.70, 0.77) and for Model 2 0.71 (95% CI 0.68, 0.75). Conclusions We present a VTE risk assessment model for use in medical inpatients. The score is simple and relies on information known at the time of admission and typically collected in all medical inpatients. External validation is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:634 / 641
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Medical Inpatients: Effect on Outcomes and Costs
    Baser, Onur
    Sengupta, Nishan
    Dysinger, Anne
    Wang, Li
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2012, 18 (06): : 294 - 302
  • [32] Risk factors for venous and arterial thrombosis
    Previtali, Emanuele
    Bucciarelli, Paolo
    Passamonti, Serena M.
    Martinelli, Ida
    BLOOD TRANSFUSION, 2011, 9 (02) : 120 - 138
  • [33] Incidence and Risk Factors for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Its Impact on Outcome in Patients Admitted to Medical Critical Care
    Krishnamoorthy, Adhiti
    Hansdak, Samuel G.
    Peter, John, V
    Pichamuthu, Kishore
    Rajan, Sudha J.
    Sudarsan, Thomas, I
    Gibikote, Sridhar
    Jeyaseelan, Lakshmanan
    Sudarsanam, Thambu D.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 28 (06) : 607 - 613
  • [34] Asymptomatic and symptomatic deep venous thrombosis in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients: risk factors and therapeutic implications
    Loffredo, Lorenzo
    Vidili, Gianpaolo
    Sciacqua, Angela
    Cogliati, Chiara
    Di Giulio, Rosella
    Bernardini, Sciaila
    Ciacci, Paolo
    Pietrangelo, Antonello
    Orlando, Federica
    Paraninfi, Aurora
    Boddi, Maria
    Di Minno, Giovanni
    Falsetti, Lorenzo
    Lodigiani, Corrado
    Santoliquido, Angelo
    Ettorre, Evaristo
    Pignatelli, Pasquale
    Arezzo, Maria Felice
    Gutu, Evghenii
    Harenberg, Job
    Violi, Francesco
    AURELIO Study Grp
    THROMBOSIS JOURNAL, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [35] Risk factors of venous thrombosis in patients with ankle fractures
    Yi, X.
    Zhu, J.
    Wei, M.
    Li, J.
    Chen, J.
    Wang, Y.
    Shen, E.
    Hu, B.
    INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 2014, 33 (04) : 324 - 328
  • [36] Thromboprophylaxis use in medical and surgical inpatients and the impact of an electronic risk assessment tool as part of a multi-factorial intervention. A report on behalf of the elVis study investigators
    Janus, Edward
    Bassi, Anmol
    Jackson, David
    Nandurkar, Harshal
    Yates, Mark
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2011, 32 (03) : 279 - 287
  • [37] Real-world economic burden of venous thromboembolism and antithrombotic prophylaxis in medical inpatients
    Gussoni, Gualberto
    Foglia, Emanuela
    Frasson, Stefania
    Casartelli, Luca
    Campanini, Mauro
    Bonfanti, Marzia
    Colombo, Fabrizio
    Porazzi, Emanuele
    Ageno, Walter
    Vescovo, Giorgio
    Mazzone, Antonino
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2013, 131 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [38] The magnitude of an iatrogenic disorder: A systematic review of the incidence of venous thromboembolism for general medical inpatients
    Dunn, Andrew S.
    Brenner, Adam
    Halm, Ethan A.
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2006, 95 (05) : 758 - 762
  • [39] Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the original and modified Wells score in inpatients and outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis
    Engelberger, Rolf P.
    Aujesky, Drahomir
    Calanca, Luca
    Staeger, Philippe
    Hugli, Olivier
    Mazzolai, Lucia
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2011, 127 (06) : 535 - 539
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical inpatients: a meta-analysis
    Sjaelander, A.
    Jansson, J. -H.
    Bergqvist, D.
    Eriksson, H.
    Carlberg, B.
    Svensson, P.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 263 (01) : 52 - 60