Pretreatment staging by endoscopic ultrasonography does not predict complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Mallery, S
DeCamp, M
Bueno, R
Mentzer, SJ
Sugarbaker, DJ
Swanson, SJ
Van Dam, J
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Thorac Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
esophagus; carcinoma classification; staging; neoadjuvant; chemoradiation; esophagectomy; endosonography; endoscopy;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990901)86:5<764::AID-CNCR10>3.0.CO;2-W
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND, Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) provides highly accurate preoperative T and N classifications in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Although previous data have suggested that patients with tumors classified as T4 by EUS do not benefit from surgical resection, these data were acquired. prior to the widespread use-of preoperative chemoradiation. The current study investigated whether pretreatment EUS can predict a complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS, Patients with esophageal carcinoma (adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma) underwent EUS classification prior to therapy. patients classified as T2, T3, or T4 and MO were treated with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiation under protocol. Patients with T1 lesions underwent resection without prior chemoradiation. Chemoradiation was followed in all cases by attempted surgical resection. The initial EUS classification was compared with the final pathologic results. RESULTS. Fifty-five patients (47 males and 8 females) with a mean age of 60.5 years (range, 31-78 years) were evaluated. There were 41 adenocarcinomas and 14 squamous cell carcinomas. Among the total population, a complete response was achieved in 3 of 5 patients (60%) with tumors classified as T2 by EUS, 14 of 42 patients (33%) with tumors classified as T3 by EUS, and 5 of 8 patients (63%) with tumors classified as T4 by EUS (P = 0.19). A complete response was achieved in 9 of 24 patients (38%) found to have N0 disease by EUS versus 13 of 30 patients (43%) determined to have NI disease (P = 0.66). The results for patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma were similar. CONCLUSIONS. The results of the current study demonstrate that pretreatment EUS does not predict reliably which patients with esophageal carcinoma will achieve a complete pathologic response to preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation. (C) 1999 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:764 / 769
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CAN PRETREATMENT RECTAL MRI PREDICT RESPONSE TO NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION THERAPY?
    Chang, G.
    You, Y.
    Park, I.
    Kaur, H.
    Hu, C.
    Rodriguez-Bigas, M.
    Skibber, J.
    Ernst, R.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (05) : E11 - E11
  • [22] The role of comprehensive evaluation for clinical complete response in predicting pathologic complete response in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
    Im, H-S.
    Kang, J.
    Kim, Y-H.
    Kim, H. R.
    Kim, J. H.
    Jung, H-Y.
    Lee, G-H.
    Song, H. J.
    Kim, D. H.
    Choi, K. D.
    Lee, J. H.
    Ahn, J. Y.
    Ryu, J-S.
    Cho, K-J.
    Kim, S-B.
    Park, S. R.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 : 213 - 213
  • [23] Recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery for esophageal cancer: Does the pattern of recurrence differ for patients with complete response and those with partial or no response?
    Meguid, Robert A.
    Hooker, Craig M.
    Taylor, Joshua T.
    Kleinberg, Laurence R.
    Cattaneo, Stephen M., II
    Sussman, Marc S.
    Yang, Stephen C.
    Heitmiller, Richard F.
    Forastiere, Arlene A.
    Brock, Malcolm V.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 138 (06): : 1309 - 1317
  • [24] ACCURACY OF ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY FOR RE-STAGING RECTAL CANCER AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION THERAPY
    Berretti, D.
    Pevere, S.
    Marino, M.
    Zucchi, E.
    Lodolo, I.
    Zilli, M.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2011, 43 : S167 - S167
  • [25] Using clinical and radiomic feature–based machine learning models to predict pathological complete response in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation
    Jin Wang
    Xiang Zhu
    Jian Zeng
    Cheng Liu
    Wei Shen
    Xiaojiang Sun
    Qingren Lin
    Jun Fang
    Qixun Chen
    Yongling Ji
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 8554 - 8563
  • [26] DNA Repair Biomarkers Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Esophageal Cancer
    Alexander, B. M.
    Wang, X.
    Niemierko, A.
    Roof, K. S.
    Fidias, P. M.
    Mathisen, D. J.
    Weaver, D. T.
    Choi, N. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S91 - S91
  • [27] Endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma after preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy
    Laterza, E
    de Manzoni, G
    Guglielmi, A
    Rodella, L
    Tedesco, P
    Cordiano, C
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 67 (05): : 1466 - 1469
  • [28] Pathologic complete response after esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for esophageal carcinoma: A cure sometimes?
    Groth, Shawn S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 157 (03): : 1260 - 1261
  • [29] Using clinical and radiomic feature-based machine learning models to predict pathological complete response in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation
    Wang, Jin
    Zhu, Xiang
    Zeng, Jian
    Liu, Cheng
    Shen, Wei
    Sun, Xiaojiang
    Lin, Qingren
    Fang, Jun
    Chen, Qixun
    Ji, Yongling
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (12) : 8554 - 8563
  • [30] Can Clinical Response Predict Pathologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer?
    Khaitan, Puja G.
    Holliday, Tyler
    Carroll, Austin
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Bayley, Erin M.
    Zhou, Nicolas
    Desale, Sameer
    Watson, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 26 (07) : 1345 - 1351