Qualitative and quantitative detection of urinary human complement factor H-related protein (BTA stat and BTA TRAK) and fragments of cytokeratins 8, 18 (UBC rapid and UBCIRMA) as markers for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder

被引:43
作者
Babjuk, M [1 ]
Kostírová, M
Mudra, K
Pecher, S
Smolová, H
Pecen, L
Ibrahim, Z
Dvorácek, J
Jarolím, L
Novák, J
Zima, T
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Postgraduate Inst, Fac Med 1,Gen Teaching Hosp, Dept Urol, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Gen Teaching Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Gen Mil Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Acad Sci Czech Republic, Inst Comp Sci, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
TCC of the bladder; BTA stat and BTA TRAK; UBC rapid and UBCIRMA; urinary cytology;
D O I
10.1016/S0302-2838(01)00015-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the role of BTA stat, BTA TRAK, UBC Rapid, UBC IRMA and voided urinary cytology in the detection of bladder transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). Methods: The study included 78 patients with TCC of the bladder (group A), 62 patients with a history of bladder TCC without tumor recurrence at the time of examination (B, control group), 20 patients with other malignancy of the urinary tract (C), 38 patients with non-malignant urinary tract diseases (D), 10 patients with urinary tract infection (E) and 10 healthy volunteers (F). Except in group R voided urine was collected before cystoscopy or cystectomy. Results: The specificity and sensitivity in bladder cancer detection were 87.1 and 74.4%, respectively with BTA stat, 79.3 and 48.7%, respectively with UBC Rapid, 100 and 33.3%, respectively with cytology, 72.6 and 75.6%, respectively with BTA TRAK, 64.5 and 70.5%, respectively with UBC IRMA. Conclusions: The BTA stat and BTATRAK tests are superior to UBC Rapid, UBC IRMA and urinary cytology in detection of bladder TCC. In daily practice however cytology remains the best adjunct to cystoscopy because of its high sensitivity in Tis and 100% specificity. Cystoscopy cannot be replaced by any of evaluated methods. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 39
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] The relationship between serial measurements of the level of a bladder tumor associated antigen and the potential for recurrence
    Blumenstein, BA
    Ellis, WJ
    Ishak, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (01) : 57 - 60
  • [2] Clinical evaluation of the BTA TRAK assay and comparison to voided urine cytology and the Bard BTA test in patients with recurrent bladder tumors
    Ellis, WJ
    Blumenstein, BA
    Ishak, LM
    Enfield, DL
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (06) : 882 - 887
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of urinary cytology, and deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometry and cytology on bladder washings during followup for bladder tumors
    Gregoire, M
    Fradet, Y
    Meyer, F
    Tetu, B
    Bois, R
    Bedard, G
    Charrois, R
    Naud, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (05) : 1660 - 1664
  • [4] Quantitative detection of human complement factor H-related protein in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder
    Heicappell, R
    Wettig, IC
    Schostak, M
    Müller, M
    Steiner, U
    Sauter, T
    Miller, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 35 (01) : 81 - 87
  • [5] Kavaler E, 1998, CANCER, V82, P708, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980215)82:4<708::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-1
  • [7] Kinders R, 1998, CLIN CANCER RES, V4, P2511
  • [8] KOLCOVA V, 1999, ZHOUBNE NOVOTVARY
  • [9] Comparison of the BTA stat™ test with voided urine cytology and bladder wash cytology in the diagnosis and monitoring of bladder cancer
    Leyh, H
    Marberger, M
    Conort, P
    Sternberg, C
    Pansadoro, V
    Pagano, F
    Bassi, P
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Ravery, V
    Treiber, U
    Ishak, L
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 35 (01) : 52 - 56
  • [10] Comparison of the monoclonal UBC-ELISA test and the NMP22 ELISA test for the detection of urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder
    Mian, C
    Lodde, M
    Haitel, A
    Vigl, EE
    Marberger, M
    Pycha, A
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (02) : 223 - 226