Nasogastric tube as abdominal pressure sensor in urodynamicsProof of concept of a novel approach

被引:2
作者
VijayGanapathy, Sundaramoorthy [1 ]
Karthikeyan, Vilvapathy Senguttuvan [1 ]
Mallya, Ashwin [1 ]
Poonawala, Ali [1 ]
Keshavamurthy, Ramaiah [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nephrourol, Dept Urol, Victoria Hosp Campus, Bangalore 560002, Karnataka, India
关键词
abdominal pressure; nasogastric tube; rectal transducer; urodynamics; TERMINOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/nau.23348
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AimsThe standard sensor for abdominal pressure (Pabd) measurement in urodynamics (UD) is a rectal sensor. In patients where the rectum is not available due to prior surgery or when external anal sphincter (EAS) tone is poor, rectal sensor may slip, making Pabd recording unreliable. Vaginal Pabd measurement and wireless vaginal sensors have been tried. We present our preliminary series of a novel nasogastric tube (NG) sensor for Pabd measurement. MethodsWe identified patients undergoing UD with a NG Pabd sensor from a prospectively maintained UD database of a tertiary care urological center between July 2013 and December 2016. ResultsOut of 1325 urodynamic procedures done, 46 (3.5%) were performed using NG Pabd sensor. The median (IQR) age was 44 (12) years. Indications for UD in these patients were neurogenic bladder in 22 (47.8%), urinary retention in 17 (37%), post-meningomyelocele repair in four (8.7%), traumatic paraplegia in two (4.3%), and cervical myelopathy in one (2.2%). The indications for NG Pabd sensor were lax EAS tone (40; 86.9%), post-abdominoperineal resection (2; 4.3%), and painful thrombosed hemorrhoids (4; 8.7%). It was possible to make definitive urodynamic diagnosis in all patients using NG Pabd sensor. Initial calibration and NG Pabd excursions throughout the study were similar to that of rectal Pabd sensor. There were no problems with NG tube tolerance. ConclusionUse of nasogastric sensor is feasible, accurate, cost-effective, and viable alternative for Pabd measurement in patients with poor anal tone or absent rectum due to postoperative status.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 791
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Abrams P, 2002, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V21, P167, DOI 10.1002/nau.10052
[2]  
Abrams P., 2006, Urodynamics, P17
[3]   Clinical evaluation of a high-fidelity wireless intravaginal pressure sensor [J].
Arora, Anuprita S. ;
Kruger, Jennifer A. ;
Budgett, David M. ;
Hayward, Lynsey M. ;
Smalldridge, Jackie ;
Nielsen, Poul F. ;
Kirton, Robert S. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (02) :243-249
[4]   MULTICHANNEL URODYNAMIC STUDIES [J].
BLAIVAS, J .
UROLOGY, 1984, 23 (05) :421-438
[5]   Direction sensitive sensor probe for the evaluation of voluntary and reflex pelvic floor contractions [J].
Constantinou, Christos E. ;
Omata, Sadao .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2007, 26 (03) :386-391
[6]   An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) Joint Report on the Terminology for Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction [J].
Haylen, Bernard T. ;
de Ridder, Dirk ;
Freeman, Robert M. ;
Swift, Steven E. ;
Berghmans, Bary ;
Lee, Joseph ;
Monga, Ash ;
Petri, Eckhard ;
Rizk, Diaa E. ;
Sand, Peter K. ;
Schaer, Gabriel N. .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2010, 29 (01) :4-20
[7]   THE VAGINA AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE RECTUM IN MEASURING ABDOMINAL PRESSURE DURING URODYNAMIC INVESTIGATIONS [J].
JAMES, ED ;
NIBLETT, PG ;
MACNAUGHTON, JA ;
SHALDON, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 60 (03) :212-216
[8]   Urodynamic assessment of patients with stress incontinence: how effective are urethral pressure profilometry and abdominal leak point pressures at case selection and predicting outcome? [J].
Lemack, GE .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2004, 14 (06) :307-311
[9]  
Levy H, 1998, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V8, P529
[10]  
Marderstein EL, 2004, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V199, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.03.011