Kinship Testing Based on SNPs Using Microarray System

被引:8
作者
Cho, Sohee [1 ]
Seo, Hee Jin [1 ]
Lee, Jihyun [1 ]
Yu, Hyung Jin [2 ]
Lee, Soong Deok [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Forens Med, Coll Med, 28 Yongon Dong, Seoul, South Korea
[2] DNA Link, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Inst Forens Sci, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
SNP; Kinship testing; Microarray; Reference database; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS; IDENTIFICATION; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1159/000446322
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Kinship testing using biallelic SNP markers has been demonstrated to be a promising approach as a supplement to standard STR typing, and several systems, such as pyrosequencing and microarray, have been introduced and utilized in real forensic cases. The Affymetrix microarray containing 169 autosomal SNPs developed for forensic application was applied to our practical case for kinship analysis that had remained inconclusive due to partial STR profiles of degraded DNA and possibility of inbreeding within the population. Case Report: 169 autosomal SNPs were typed on array with severely degraded DNA of two bone samples, and the kinship compared to genotypes in a reference database of their putative family members. Results: Two bone samples remained unidentified through traditional STR typing with partial profiles of 10 or 14 of 16 alleles. Because these samples originated from a geographically isolated population, a cautious approach was required when analyzing and declaring true paternity only based on PI values. In a supplementary SNP typing, 106 and 78 SNPs were obtained, and the match candidates were found in each case with improved PI values than using only STRs and with no discrepant SNPs in comparison. Conclusion: Our case showed that the utility of multiple SNPs on array is expected in practical forensic case works with an establishment of reference database. (C) 2016 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 432
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Pros and cons in the use of SNPs in forensic kinship investigation: a comparative analysis with STRs [J].
Amorim, A ;
Pereira, L .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 150 (01) :17-21
[2]  
[Anonymous], AFFYMETRIX GENECHIP
[3]   Mutations and/or close relatives? Six case work examples where 49 autosomal SNPs were used as supplementary markers [J].
Borsting, Claus ;
Morling, Niels .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2011, 5 (03) :236-241
[4]   Performance of the SNPforID 52 SNP-plex assay in paternity testing [J].
Borsting, Claus ;
Sanchez, Juan J. ;
Hansen, Hanna E. ;
Hansen, Anders J. ;
Bruun, Hanne Q. ;
Morling, Niels .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2008, 2 (04) :292-300
[5]  
Butler JM, 2014, ADV TOPICS FORENSIC, P260
[6]  
Cho Sohee, 2014, [The Korean Journal of Legal Medicine, 대한법의학회지], V38, P175
[7]   Forensic application of SNP-based resequencing array for individual identification [J].
Cho, Sohee ;
Yu, Hyung Jin ;
Han, Jisung ;
Kim, Yoonsoo ;
Lee, Jihyun ;
Lee, Soong Deok .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2014, 13 :45-52
[8]   High-throughput variation detection and genotyping using microarrays [J].
Cutler, DJ ;
Zwick, ME ;
Carrasquillo, MM ;
Yohn, CT ;
Tobin, KP ;
Kashuk, C ;
Mathews, DJ ;
Shah, NA ;
Eichler, EE ;
Warrington, JA ;
Chakravarti, A .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2001, 11 (11) :1913-1925
[9]   Evaluating DNA tests of motherless cases using a Philippine genetic database [J].
De Ungria, MCA ;
Frani, AM ;
Magno, MMF ;
Tabbada, KA ;
Calacal, GC ;
Delfin, FC ;
Halos, SC .
TRANSFUSION, 2002, 42 (07) :954-957
[10]   A DNA microarray system for forensic SNP analysis [J].
Divne, AM ;
Allen, M .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 154 (2-3) :111-121