Intermixed Normal Tissue within Prostate Cancer: Effect on MR Imaging Measurements of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and T2-Sparse versus Dense Cancers

被引:211
作者
Langer, Deanna L. [1 ,3 ]
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. [5 ]
Evans, Andrew J. [5 ]
Sun, Laibao [6 ]
Yaffe, Martin J. [4 ,6 ]
Trachtenberg, John [1 ,2 ]
Haider, Masoom A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Hosp, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Imaging Res, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2493080236
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate differences in apparent diffusion coefficient ( ADC) and T2 values between dense and sparse regions in prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients (median age, 61 years; range, 44-72 years) gave informed consent for this retrospective Research Ethics Board-approved study. Prior to radical prostatectomy, ADC (b value, 600 sec/mm2) and T2 maps were obtained by using 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Twenty-eight peripheral zone (PZ) tumors were reviewed by using whole-mount histologic findings, and regions assessed to contain primarily (> 60%) normal PZ tissue were delineated. Tumors were categorized as "sparse" if more than 50% of their cross-sectional areas were these primarily normal PZ regions and were considered "dense" otherwise. Normal PZ tissue was outlined separately on the same section. Tumor and normal tissue outlines were transferred to corresponding ADC and T2 maps, and median values were calculated. Values were compared by using multiple regression analysis. Matched-pair tumor-to-normal tissue differences and log(2)-transformed ratios were assessed by using nonparametric tests. Results: Thirty-six percent (10 of 28) of tumors were sparse; 64% ( 18 of 28) were dense. For both overall and intrapatient comparisons, dense tumors had significantly lower ADC and T2 values than normal PZ tissue (P < .05), but no significant differences were observed between sparse tumors and normal tissue. Log(2)-transformed tumor-to-normal tissue ratios were significantly less than zero for dense tumors for both ADC and T2 (P < .01) measurements but not for sparse tumors. Both matched-pair differences and log2-transformed ratios were significantly different between sparse and dense tumors (P < .01). ADC and T2 values were moderately correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient range, r = 0.770-0.804). Conclusion: Sparse prostate tumors have similar ADC and T2 values to those of normal PZ tissue. This may limit MR imaging detection and the assessment of tumor volume of some cancers. (C) RSNA, 2008
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 908
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier [J].
Chan, I ;
Wells, W ;
Mulkern, RV ;
Haker, S ;
Zhang, JQ ;
Zou, KH ;
Maier, SE ;
Tempany, CMC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (09) :2390-2398
[2]   MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: Preliminary results [J].
de Bazelaire, CMJ ;
Duhamel, GD ;
Rofsky, NM ;
Alsop, DC .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) :652-659
[3]   Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: the value of apparent diffusion coefficients for identifying malignant nodules [J].
DeSouza, N. M. ;
Reinsberg, S. A. ;
Scurr, E. D. ;
Brewster, J. M. ;
Payne, G. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 80 (950) :90-95
[4]  
Devore J., 1993, STAT EXPLORATION ANA
[5]  
Eggener SE, 2007, J UROLOGY, V178, P2260, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.072
[6]   MR-IMAGING AND SONOGRAPHY OF EARLY PROSTATIC-CANCER - PATHOLOGICAL AND IMAGING FEATURES THAT INFLUENCE IDENTIFICATION AND DIAGNOSIS [J].
ELLIS, JH ;
TEMPANY, C ;
SARIN, MS ;
GATSONIS, C ;
RIFKIN, MD ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (04) :865-872
[7]   Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging [J].
Fuetterer, Jurgen J. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. ;
Scheenen, Tom W. J. ;
Veltman, Jeroen ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
Vos, Pieter ;
Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Krabbe, Paul F. M. ;
Heerschap, Arend ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) :449-458
[8]   Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diflusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Tozer, DJ ;
Liney, GP ;
Turnbull, LW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (06) :1054-1058
[9]   Per-sextant localization and staging of prostate cancer: Correlation of imaging findings with whole-mount step section histopathology [J].
Graser, Anno ;
Heuck, Andreas ;
Sommer, Bernhard ;
Massmann, Joerg ;
Scheidler, Juergen ;
Reiser, Maximillian ;
Mueller-Lisse, Ullrich .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (01) :84-90
[10]   Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer [J].
Haider, Masoom A. ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. ;
Tanguay, Jeff ;
Evans, Andrew J. ;
Hashmi, Ali-Tahir ;
Lockwood, Gina ;
Trachtenberg, John .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (02) :323-328