Effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral group intervention for knee osteoarthritis pain: protocol of a randomized controlled trial

被引:14
作者
Helminen, Eeva-Eerika [1 ,2 ]
Sinikallio, Sanna H. [3 ]
Valjakka, Anna L. [4 ]
Vaisanen-Rouvali, Rauni H. [1 ]
Arokoski, Jari P. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Kuopio Hlth Ctr, FI-70101 Kuopio, Finland
[3] Univ Eastern Finland, Inst Publ Hlth & Clin Nutr, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[4] Subst Abuse & Mental Hlth Unit Raisio, FI-21200 Raisio, Finland
[5] Univ Eastern Finland, Inst Clin Med, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
关键词
Osteoarthritis; Pain management; Cognitive-behavioral; Psychological; Intervention study; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; SELF-EFFICACY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; CATASTROPHIZING SCALE; OARSI RECOMMENDATIONS; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; COPING STRATEGIES; WESTERN-ONTARIO; BACK-PAIN; COHERENCE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-14-46
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Knee osteoarthritis is the most common type of arthritis, with pain being its most common symptom. Little is known about the psychological aspects of knee osteoarthritis pain. There is an emerging consensus among osteoarthritis specialists about the importance of addressing not only biological but also psychosocial factors in the assessment and treatment of osteoarthritis. As few studies have evaluated the effect of psychological interventions on knee osteoarthritis pain, good quality randomized controlled trials are needed to determine their effectiveness. Methods/Design: We intend to conduct a 6-week single-blinded randomized controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up. Altogether, 108 patients aged from 35 to 75 years with clinical symptoms and radiographic grading (KL 2-4) of knee osteoarthritis will be included. The clinical inclusion criteria are pain within the last year in or around the knee occurring on most days for at least one month, and knee pain of >= 40 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale in the WOMAC pain subscale for one week prior to study entry. Patients with any severe psychiatric disorder, other back or lower limb pain symptoms more aggravating than knee pain, or previous or planned lower extremity joint surgery will be excluded. The patients will be randomly assigned to a combined GP care and cognitive-behavioral intervention group (n = 54) or to a GP care control group (n = 54). The cognitive-behavioral intervention will consist of 6 weekly group sessions supervised by a psychologist and a physiotherapist experienced in the treatment of pain. The main goals of the intervention are to reduce maladaptive pain coping and to increase the self-management of pain and disability. The follow-up-points will be arranged at 3 and 12 months. The primary outcome measure will be the WOMAC pain subscale. Secondary outcome measures will include self-reports of pain and physical function, a health related quality of life questionnaire, and various psychological questionnaires. Personnel responsible of the data analysis will be blinded. Discussion: This study addresses the current topic of non-pharmacological conservative treatment of knee OA-related pain. We anticipate that these results will provide important new insights to the current care recommendations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Aalto A, 1999, RAND-36 as an indicator of health related quality of life: Reliability and reference values in the Finnish population
[2]   The Beck Depression Inventory and General Health Questionnaire as measures of depression in the general population: A validation study using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview as the gold standard [J].
Aalto, Anna-Mari ;
Elovainio, Marko ;
Kivimaki, Mika ;
Uutela, Antti ;
Pirkola, Sami .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2012, 197 (1-2) :163-171
[3]  
Allardt E., 1973, About dimension of welfare: an explanatory analysis of the comparative scandinavian survey
[4]   DEVELOPMENT OF CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND REPORTING OF OSTEOARTHRITIS - CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE [J].
ALTMAN, R ;
ASCH, E ;
BLOCH, D ;
BOLE, G ;
BORENSTEIN, D ;
BRANDT, K ;
CHRISTY, W ;
COOKE, TD ;
GREENWALD, R ;
HOCHBERG, M ;
HOWELL, D ;
KAPLAN, D ;
KOOPMAN, W ;
LONGLEY, S ;
MANKIN, H ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
MEDSGER, T ;
MEENAN, R ;
MIKKELSEN, W ;
MOSKOWITZ, R ;
MURPHY, W ;
ROTHSCHILD, B ;
SEGAL, M ;
SOKOLOFF, L ;
WOLFE, F .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1986, 29 (08) :1039-1049
[5]   THE STRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES OF THE SENSE OF COHERENCE SCALE [J].
ANTONOVSKY, A .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1993, 36 (06) :725-733
[6]   Osteoarthritis: Epidemiology [J].
Arden, N ;
Nevitt, MC .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01) :3-25
[7]   Self efficacy as a mediator of the relationship between pain intensity, disability and depression in chronic pain patients [J].
Arnstein, P ;
Caudill, M ;
Mandle, CL ;
Norris, A ;
Beasley, R .
PAIN, 1999, 80 (03) :483-491
[8]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING CLINICAL ANXIETY - PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES [J].
BECK, AT ;
BROWN, G ;
EPSTEIN, N ;
STEER, RA .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 56 (06) :893-897
[9]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[10]  
BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833