Two-Phase Thermophilic Acidification and Mesophilic Methanogenesis Anaerobic Digestion of Waste-Activated Sludge

被引:33
作者
Demirer, Goksel N. [1 ]
Othman, Maazuza [2 ]
机构
[1] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Environm Engn, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
[2] RMIT Univ, Sch Civil Environm & Chem Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
关键词
anaerobic digestion; waste activated sludge; phase separation; acidification;
D O I
10.1089/ees.2007.0242
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biological pretreatment methods of waste-activated sludge (WAS) have recently received attention because of their efficiency and relatively low investment. The application of hydrolysis/acidification step before methanization in anaerobic digestion or the two-phase anaerobic digestion process constitutes one of these methods. Two phase (thermophilic acidification and mesophilic methanogenesis) anaerobic digestion of WAS was investigated and reported to perform better in terms of chemical oxygen demand (COD) solubilization, volatile solids destruction, gas production, and pathogen indicator reduction. The solids loading rates (SLR) used in these studies were significantly high (6.5-28.9 g volatile solids (VS)/L . day). It is well-known that high SLRs along with low retention times lead to higher acidification in two-phase systems. However, WAS from different wastewater treatment plants is likely to have different concentrations due to different process configurations and operational practices that lead to lower solids loading rates. Therefore, this study investigated the performance of thermophilic anaerobic preacidification of WAS prior to conventional mesophilic (methanogenic) anaerobic digestion at low SLRs (0.98-3.93 g VS/L . day). To this purpose, continuous anaerobic acidogenic reactors with no recycle were operated at two different HRT (or SRT) values of 2 and 4 days, and three different SLR values of 0.98, 1.97, and 3.93 g VS/L . day. After the acidification reactors reached to steady-state conditions, the preacidified WAS samples (or the effluents of thermophilic acidogenic anaerobic reactors) and raw WAS samples (or the feeds to the thermophilic acidogenic anaerobic reactors) were subjected to biochemical methane potential (BMP) assay. Results indicated that thermophilic preacidification led to a 20.9-34.8% increase in dissolved (soluble) COD concentration and 18.2-33.3% CODt reduction in acidogenic reactors. When the CODt removals observed for preacidification and BMP were both considered, preacidification (or phase separation) has led to 26.2-49.4% additional CODt removal. It is apparent from these results that beneficial effect of preacidification on CODt removal is sustained for low SLRs (0.98-3.93 g VS/L . day).
引用
收藏
页码:1291 / 1300
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
American Public Health Association, 1998, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[2]   Volatile solids reduction in two-phase and conventional anaerobic sludge digestion [J].
Bhattacharya, SK ;
Madura, RL ;
Walling, DA ;
Farrell, JB .
WATER RESEARCH, 1996, 30 (05) :1041-1048
[3]  
BOLZONELLA D, 2007, IND ENG CHEM RES
[4]  
BORCHARDT JA, 1971, ADV CHEM SER, V105, P108
[5]   Two-phases anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes: bioreactors performance [J].
Bouallagui, H ;
Torrijos, A ;
Godon, JJ ;
Moletta, R ;
Ben Cheikh, R ;
Touhami, Y ;
Delgenes, JP ;
Di, AH .
BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2004, 21 (02) :193-197
[6]   Solubilisation of waste-activated sludge by ultrasonic treatment [J].
Bougrier, C ;
Carrère, H ;
Delgenès, JP .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2005, 106 (02) :163-169
[7]   Anaerobic thermophilic/mesophilic dual-stage sludge treatment [J].
Cheunbarn, T ;
Pagilla, KR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2000, 126 (09) :796-801
[8]  
Choi H, 2006, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V97, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.023
[9]  
Delgenes JP, 2003, ChemInform, V34
[10]   Anaerobic acidogenesis of dairy wastewater: the effects of variations in hydraulic retention time with no pH control [J].
Demirel, B ;
Yenigun, O .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 79 (07) :755-760