Planning, development pressure, and change in green infrastructure quantity and configuration in coastal Texas

被引：4

作者：

Woodruff, Sierra ^{[1
]}

Bae, Jinhyun ^{[1
]}

Sohn, Wonmin ^{[2
]}

Newman, Galen ^{[1
]}

Tran, Tho ^{[1
]}

Lee, Jessica ^{[1
]}

Wilkins, Chandler ^{[1
]}

Van Zandt, Shannon ^{[1
]}

Ndubisi, Forster ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning, College Stn, TX 77843 USA

[2] Michigan State Univ, Sch Planning Design Construct, E Lansing, MI USA

来源：

LAND USE POLICY | 2022年 / 114卷

关键词：

Comprehensive planning; Plan Quality; Green Infrastructure; Plan Implementation; FRAGSTAT; Gulf Coast; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND-USE; DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS; URBAN FORESTS; OPEN SPACE; LANDSCAPE; PLANS; QUALITY; IMPLEMENTATION; BIODIVERSITY;

D O I：

10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105893

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Land-use change is a lead driver of ecological degradation in coastal regions. By guiding where development and open space are located, local land use plans are theorized to be an important tool to protect green infrastructure in coastal areas and their related services. Higher quality plans are expected to lead to greater protection of green infrastructure (GI). Using multiple linear regression, we test whether the presence and quality of comprehensive plans are related to change in GI landscape configuration between 2000 and 2016 in cities along Texas' coast. We find that comprehensive planning and plan quality are negatively associated with change in GI quantity and landscape pattern. Our results suggest that, in Texas, planning is mostly reactive; development pressure and environmental degradation likely lead to both loss of green infrastructure and city adoption of comprehensive plans.

引用

页数：11

共 90 条

[1] Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design [J].

Ahern, Jack .

LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2013, 28 (06) :1203-1212

[2] Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: The ES-in-Planning framework [J].

Albert, Christian ;

Galler, Carolin ;

Hermes, Johannes ;

Neuendorf, Felix ;

von Haaren, Christina ;

Lovett, Andrew .

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 :100-113

[3]

Anderson J.R., 1976, US Geological Survey Professional Paper 964

[4] General plan evaluation criteria - An approach to making better plans [J].

Baer, WC .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1997, 63 (03) :329-344

[5] The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services [J].

Barbier, Edward B. ;

Hacker, Sally D. ;

Kennedy, Chris ;

Koch, Evamaria W. ;

Stier, Adrian C. ;

Silliman, Brian R. .

ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2011, 81 (02) :169-193

[6]

Benedict M., 2006, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE

[7] Evaluation of Networks of Plans and Vulnerability to Hazards and Climate Change [J].

Berke, Philip ;

Newman, Galen ;

Lee, Jaekyung ;

Combs, Tabitha ;

Kolosna, Carl ;

Salvesen, David .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2015, 81 (04) :287-302

[8] Searching for the Good Plan A Meta-Analysis of Plan Quality Studies [J].

Berke, Philip ;

Godschalk, David .

JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2009, 23 (03) :227-240

[9]

Berke PhilipR., 1996, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V39, P79, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09640569612688, 10.1080/09640569612688]

[10]

Berke PhilipR., 2006, URBAN LAND USE PLANN, V5th

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 →