Do interactions with candidates increase voter support and participation? Experimental evidence from Italy

被引:7
作者
Cantoni, Enrico [1 ]
Pons, Vincent [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Econ, Bologna, Italy
[2] Harvard Sch Business, Business Govt & Int Econ, Boston, MA 02163 USA
[3] Natl Bur Econ Res NBER, Boston, MA USA
关键词
campaigns; candidates; elections; experiment; Italy; political parties; turnout; voting behavior; FIELD EXPERIMENT; CAMPAIGN MESSAGES; DIRECT MAIL; TURNOUT; MOBILIZATION; ELECTIONS; BEHAVIOR; WELFARE; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1111/ecpo.12167
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We test whether politicians can use direct contact to reconnect with citizens, increase turnout, and win votes. During the 2014 Italian municipal elections, we randomly assigned 26,000 voters to receive visits from city council candidates, canvassers supporting the candidates' list, or to a control group. While canvassers' visits increased turnout by 1.8 percentage points, candidates' had no impact on participation. Candidates increased their own vote share in the precincts they canvassed, but only at the expense of other candidates on the list. This suggests that their failure to mobilize non-voters resulted from focusing on securing the preferences of active voters.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 402
页数:24
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174954
[2]   I'm asking for your support: The effects of personally delivered campaign messages on voting decisions and opinion formation [J].
Arceneaux, Kevin .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 2 (01) :43-65
[3]   Comparing Negative and Positive Campaign Messages Evidence From Two Field Experiments [J].
Arceneaux, Kevin ;
Nickerson, David W. .
AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2010, 38 (01) :54-83
[4]   Who Is Mobilized to Vote? A Re-Analysis of 11 Field Experiments [J].
Arceneaux, Kevin ;
Nickerson, David W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 53 (01) :1-16
[5]   Campaign finance and voter welfare with entrenched incumbents [J].
Ashworth, S .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2006, 100 (01) :55-68
[6]   "Sure, I voted for the winner!" Overreport of the primary vote for the party nominee in the National Election Studies [J].
Atkeson L.R. .
Political Behavior, 1999, 21 (3) :197-215
[7]   Unresponsive and Unpersuaded: The Unintended Consequences of a Voter Persuasion Effort [J].
Bailey, Michael A. ;
Hopkins, Daniel J. ;
Rogers, Todd .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2016, 38 (03) :713-746
[8]  
Ballini P. L., 2002, STORIA CAMPAGNE ELET, V1, P302
[9]   What Persuades Voters? A Field Experiment on Political Campaigning [J].
Barton, Jared ;
Castillo, Marco ;
Petrie, Ragan .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2014, 124 (574) :F293-F326
[10]   It's a Group Thing: How Voters go to the Polls Together [J].
Bhatti, Yosef ;
Fieldhouse, Edward ;
Hansen, Kasper M. .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 42 (01) :1-34