Target measurement uncertainty as a tool for validation of uncertainties estimated by different approaches: determination of total hardness in drinking and natural waters

被引:2
作者
Calisto, Sandra C. [1 ]
Esquivel, Maria M. [2 ]
Trancoso, Maria A. [1 ]
机构
[1] UB, Lab Nacl Engn & Geol, Lab Biocombustiveis & Ambiente, P-1649038 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Inst Super Tecn, IBB, DEQB, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Uncertainty; Validation; Total hardness; Target uncertainty; Water;
D O I
10.1007/s00769-013-1012-9
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this work, a procedure for total hardness determination in drinking and natural waters, expressed by the equivalent mass concentration of CaCO3, , using an in-house complexometric titration with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid based on standardized procedure was detailed. Compliance of the procedures requirements with legislation is discussed. Validation and quality control actions were implemented, and a limit of detection of 0.6 mg L-1 was determined fulfilling the target limit of detection of 15 mg L-1 imposed by specific legislation. Measurement precision was estimated under repeatability conditions, where relative standard deviations close to 1 % were estimated, and in within-laboratory reproducibility, where relative standard uncertainties of 4 % and 0.5 % were obtained for lower and higher than 100 mg L-1, respectively. The results were considered unbiased whenever recoveries were within the range 0.90-1.10, fulfilling the target trueness value stated as 10 % of parametric value. The performance of the measurement procedure was also assessed by proficiency testing and z scores less than 2 were obtained. Measurement uncertainty was estimated by a modeling approach, using the law of propagation of uncertainty for variables not independent, and by empirical ones, such as single-laboratory validation and quality control data and proficiency testing. Measurement uncertainty computed from each model was assessed by xi score performance indicator showing a good estimated uncertainty (|xi| < 2). Finally, a way is proposed to assess the suitability of the combined uncertainty by the different models, comparing them to a target expanded measurement uncertainty within the analytical range, calculated from maximum decreed precision and trueness criteria since no target uncertainties were stated in the legislation.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 510
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, ISO 13528:2015-Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparison
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, 200 JCGM, V200
  • [3] Ellison SLR., 2012, Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement
  • [4] GUM, 2008, EV MEAS DAT GUID EXP
  • [5] Krysell M, 2011, HDB CALCULATION MEAS
  • [6] Lipps W C., 2018, Standard Methods Committee of the American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, DOI [10.2105/SMWW.2882.023, DOI 10.2105/SMWW.2882.023]
  • [7] Miller James, 2018, Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry
  • [8] Validation of an environmental friendly segmented flow method for the determination of phenol index in waters as alternative to the conventional one
    Sousa, Ana R.
    Trancoso, Maria A.
    [J]. TALANTA, 2009, 79 (03) : 796 - 803
  • [9] [No title captured]
  • [10] [No title captured]