The impact of comorbid personality difficulties on response to IAPT treatment for depression and anxiety

被引:69
作者
Goddard, Elizabeth [1 ]
Wingrove, Janet [2 ]
Moran, Paul [3 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Clin Psychol, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn Trust, Southwark Psychol Therapies Serv, London SE5 8AZ, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Hlth Serv & Populat Res Dept, London SE5 8AF, England
关键词
Personality disorder; Depression; Anxiety; Treatment outcome; Cognitive behaviour therapy; IAPT; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; ABBREVIATED SCALE SAPAS; STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENT; PANIC DISORDER; MAJOR DEPRESSION; PRIMARY-CARE; AXIS-I; METAANALYSIS; PREVALENCE; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brat.2015.07.006
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The UK's Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) initiative provides evidence-based psychological interventions for mild to moderate common mental health problems in a primary care setting. Predictors of treatment response are unclear. This study examined the impact of personality disorder status on outcome in a large IAPT service. We hypothesised that the presence of probable personality disorder would adversely affect treatment response. Method: We used a prospective cohort design to study a consecutive sample of individuals (n = 1249). Results: Higher scores on a screening measure for personality disorder were associated with poorer outcome on measures of depression, anxiety and social functioning, and reduced recovery rates at the end of treatment. These associations were not confounded by demographic status, initial symptom severity nor number of treatment sessions. The presence of personality difficulties independently predicted reduced absolute change on all outcome measures. Conclusions: The presence of co-morbid personality difficulties adversely affects treatment outcome among individuals attending for treatment in an IAPT service. There is a need to routinely assess for the presence of personality difficulties on all individuals referred to IAPT services. This information will provide important prognostic data and could lead to the provision of more effective, personalised treatment in IAPT. (c) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, TALK THER 4 YEAR PLA
[2]  
Bateman A., 2005, Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Mentalization-based treatment
[3]  
Bienenfeld D, 2007, PSYCHIAT ANN, V37, P133
[4]   PREDICTORS OF SHORT-TERM TREATMENT RESPONSE IN 66 PATIENTS WITH PANIC DISORDER [J].
BLACK, DW ;
WESNER, RB ;
GABEL, J ;
BOWERS, W ;
MONAHAN, P .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1994, 30 (04) :233-241
[5]   Clinical utility of Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS) among patients with first episode depression [J].
Bukh, Jens Drachmann ;
Bock, Camilla ;
Vinberg, Maj ;
Gether, Ulrik ;
Kessing, Lars Vedel .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2010, 127 (1-3) :199-202
[6]   The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses [J].
Butler, AC ;
Chapman, JE ;
Forman, EM ;
Beck, AT .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 26 (01) :17-31
[7]   MCMI-DIAGNOSED PERSONALITY-DISORDERS AMONG AGORAPHOBIC OUTPATIENTS - PREVALENCE AND RELATIONSHIP TO SEVERITY AND TREATMENT OUTCOME [J].
CHAMBLESS, DL ;
RENNEBERG, B ;
GOLDSTEIN, A ;
GRACELY, EJ .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 1992, 6 (03) :193-211
[8]   Implementing NICE guidelines for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety disorders: The IAPT experience [J].
Clark, David M. .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 23 (04) :318-327
[9]  
Community and Mental Health team Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2015, Q IMPR ACC PSYCH THE
[10]  
Community and Mental Health team Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2014, Q IMPR ACC PSYCH THE