Threat-related attention bias in socioemotional development: A critical review and methodological considerations

被引:66
作者
Fu, Xiaoxue [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Perez-Edgar, Koraly [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Dept Biobehav Hlth, Columbus, OH 43205 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Pediat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Attention bias; Anxiety; Behavioral inhibition; Socioemotional development; Eye-tracking; SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER; DOT-PROBE TASK; INFORMATION-PROCESSING BIASES; PREFRONTAL CORTEX ACTIVATION; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; EYE TRACKING REVEALS; ANXIOUS YOUTH; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; FEARFUL FACES;
D O I
10.1016/j.dr.2018.11.002
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Cross-sectional evidence suggests that attention bias to threat is linked to anxiety disorders and anxiety vulnerability in both children and adults. However, there is a lack of developmental evidence regarding the causal mechanisms through which attention bias to threat might convey risks for socioemotional problems, such as anxiety. Gaining insights into this question demands longitudinal research to track the complex interplay between threat-related attention and socioemotional functioning. Developing and implementing reliable and valid assessments tools is essential to this line of work. This review presents theoretical accounts and empirical evidence from behavioral, eye-tracking, and neural assessments of attention to discuss our current understanding of the development of normative threat-related attention in infancy, as well as maladaptive threat-related attention patterns that may be associated with the development of anxiety. This review highlights the importance of measuring threat-related attention using multiple attention paradigms at multiple levels of analysis. In order to understand if and how threat-related attention bias in real-life, social interactive contexts can predict socioemotional development outcomes, this review proposes that future research cannot solely rely on screen-based paradigms but needs to extend the assessment of threat-related attention to naturalistic settings. Mobile eye-tracking technology provides an effective tool for capturing threat-related attention processes in vivo as children navigate fear-eliciting environments and may help us uncover more proximal bio-psycho-behavioral markers of anxiety.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 57
页数:27
相关论文
共 264 条
[1]   Association between attention bias to threat and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents [J].
Abend, Rany ;
de Voogd, Leone ;
Salemink, Elske ;
Wiers, Reinout W. ;
Perez-Edgar, Koraly ;
Fitzgerald, Amanda ;
White, Lauren K. ;
Salum, Giovanni A. ;
He, Jie ;
Silverman, Wendy K. ;
Pettit, Jeremy W. ;
Pine, Daniel S. ;
Bar-Haim, Yair .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2018, 35 (03) :229-238
[2]   Attachment and adolescent psychosocial functioning [J].
Allen, JP ;
Moore, C ;
Kuperminc, G ;
Bell, K .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1998, 69 (05) :1406-1419
[3]   (De)Coupling of Our Eyes and Our Mind's Eye: A Dynamic Process Perspective on Attentional Bias [J].
Amir, Iftach ;
Zvielli, Ariel ;
Bernstein, Amit .
EMOTION, 2016, 16 (07) :978-986
[4]   The attentive brain: insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience [J].
Amso, Dima ;
Scerif, Gaia .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 16 (10) :606-619
[5]   Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events [J].
Anderson, AK ;
Phelps, EA .
NATURE, 2001, 411 (6835) :305-309
[6]   Dissociated neural representations of intensity and valence in human olfaction [J].
Anderson, AK ;
Christoff, K ;
Stappen, I ;
Panitz, D ;
Ghahremani, DG ;
Glover, G ;
Gabrieli, JDE ;
Sobel, N .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (02) :196-202
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ADV NEUROSCIENCE, DOI DOI 10.1155/2014/405094
[8]  
[Anonymous], CLIN PSYCHOL REV
[9]  
[Anonymous], MANUAL PRESCHO UNPUB
[10]   Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis [J].
Armstrong, Thomas ;
Olatunji, Bunmi O. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 32 (08) :704-723