Multilevel component analysis and multilevel PLS of chemical process data

被引:35
作者
de Noord, OE
Theobald, EH
机构
[1] Shell Global Solut Int BV, Shell Res & Technol Ctr, NL-1030 BN Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Shell Chem LP, Westhollow Technol Ctr, Houston, TX 77082 USA
关键词
multilevel data analysis; PCA; PLS; process monitoring; dynamic process variation;
D O I
10.1002/cem.933
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS) are well-established techniques for analyzing multivariate process data. However, chemical processes often vary at different levels, due to, for instance, catalyst deactivation or fouling. In such cases, data from a time period that comprises multiple catalyst or fouling runs contain both variation within runs at the lower level and variation between runs at the higher level. In ordinary PCA and PLS models, these sources of variation are confounded. Multiway PCA and PLS are usually not appropriate either, because the runs in the data set can be very different, which means that the overall data set does not have a proper multiway structure. Multilevel component analysis (MLCA) and multilevel partial least squares (MLPLS) are proposed as better options for analyzing such process data. The models obtained with these techniques contain submodels for the different levels in the data, and thereby separate the within-run and between-run variation in the process variables W. In addition, MLPLS can use response variables (Y) to guide the projections into meaningful directions, and provide information on the sources of variation in Y and the relationship between X and Y. Extensions to more than two levels are straightforward, and can be used, for instance, for the comparison of runs from different plants. Copyright (C) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 307
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   SIMPLS - AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES REGRESSION [J].
DEJONG, S .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1993, 18 (03) :251-263
[2]  
FLURY BK, 1987, BIOMETRIKA, V74, P59, DOI 10.2307/2336021
[3]   Multilevel component analysis of time-resolved metabolic fingerprinting data [J].
Jansen, JJ ;
Hoefsloot, HCJ ;
van der Greef, J ;
Timmerman, ME ;
Smilde, AK .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2005, 530 (02) :173-183
[4]   HIERARCHICAL RELATIONS BETWEEN METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND A TECHNIQUE FOR ROTATION TO A SIMPLE SIMULTANEOUS STRUCTURE [J].
KIERS, HAL ;
TENBERGE, JMF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 47 :109-126
[5]   PROCESS ANALYSIS, MONITORING AND DIAGNOSIS, USING MULTIVARIATE PROJECTION METHODS [J].
KOURTI, T ;
MACGREGOR, JF .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1995, 28 (01) :3-21
[6]   MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL MONITORING OF PROCESS OPERATING PERFORMANCE [J].
KRESTA, JV ;
MACGREGOR, JF ;
MARLIN, TE .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1991, 69 (01) :35-47
[7]   Performance monitoring of a multi-product semi-batch process [J].
Lane, S ;
Martin, EB ;
Kooijmans, R ;
Morris, AJ .
JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2001, 11 (01) :1-11
[8]   MONITORING BATCH PROCESSES USING MULTIWAY PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS [J].
NOMIKOS, P ;
MACGREGOR, JF .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1994, 40 (08) :1361-1375
[9]   Monitoring a PVC batch process with multivariate statistical process control charts [J].
Tates, AA ;
Louwerse, DJ ;
Smilde, AK ;
Koot, GLM ;
Berndt, H .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1999, 38 (12) :4769-4776
[10]  
ten Berge J. M. F., 1992, STAT APPL, V4, P377