Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study

被引:6
|
作者
Patel, Sagar [1 ]
Walsh, Catharine M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Udell, Jacob A. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Kings Coll Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
[2] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Paediat, Res Inst, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Paediat, Learning Inst, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Womens Coll Hosp, Cardiovasc Div, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Womens Coll Hosp, Womens Coll, Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Medical education; Medical student; Medical careers; Summer student research programs; Clinician-scientists; PHYSICIAN-SCIENTIST; PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY; CLINICIAN-SCIENTISTS; OUTCOMES; CAREER; OPPORTUNITIES; INCREASE; SCIENCE; MODEL; INVESTIGATOR;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundSummer student research programs (SSRPs) serve to generate student interest in research and a clinician-scientist career path. This study sought to understand the composition of existing medically-related Canadian SSRPs, describe the current selection, education and evaluation practices and highlight opportunities for improvement.MethodsA cross-sectional survey study among English-language-based medically-related Canadian SSRPs for undergraduate and medical students was conducted. Programs were systematically identified through academic and/or institutional websites. The survey, administered between June-August 2016, collected information on program demographics, competition, selection, student experience, and program self-evaluation.ResultsForty-six of 91 (50.5%) identified programs responded. These SSRPs collectively offered 1842 positions with a mean 3.76 applicants per placement. Most programs (78.3%, n=36/46) required students to independently secure a research supervisor. A formal curriculum existed among 61.4% (n=27/44) of programs. Few programs (5.9%, n=2/34) offered an integrated clinical observership. Regarding evaluation, 11.4% (n=5/44) of programs tracked subsequent research productivity and 27.5% (n=11/40) conducted long-term impact assessments.ConclusionsCanadian SSRPs are highly competitive with the responsibility of selection primarily with the individual research supervisor rather than a centralized committee. Most programs offered students opportunities to develop both research and communication skills. Presently, the majority of programs do not have a sufficient evaluation component. These findings indicate that SSRPs may benefit from refinement of selection processes and more robust evaluation of their utility. To address this challenge, the authors describe a logic model that provides a set of core outcomes which can be applied as a framework to guide program evaluation of SSRPs.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Motivating factors, barriers and facilitators of participation in COVID-19 clinical research: A cross-sectional survey of Canadian community intensive care units
    Tsang, Jennifer L. Y.
    Fowler, Robert
    Cook, Deborah J.
    Burns, Karen E. A.
    Hunter, Kylee
    Forcina, Victoria
    Hwang, Anna
    Duan, Erick
    Patterson, Lisa
    Binnie, Alexandra
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):
  • [42] Trends in research grant applications and outcomes among medical students in the United Kingdom: a national self-reported cross-sectional survey
    Inyang, Deborah
    Madume, Rachael
    Corriero, Anna Chiara
    Sofela, Agbolahan
    Osunronbi, Temidayo
    REMED UK collaborators
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 100 (1180) : 106 - 111
  • [43] Evaluating the Use of E-Learning in Indian Emergency Medicine Residency Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Cross-Sectional Survey
    Krishnan, S. Vimal
    Kunju, Sanjan Asanaru
    Nayak, Sachin Sujir
    Gopinathan, Vivek
    Sirur, Freston Marc
    Kumara, Vijaya
    Balakrishnan, Jayaraj M.
    DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2023, 17
  • [44] User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study
    Shahsavar, Yeganeh
    Choudhury, Avishek
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2023, 10
  • [45] Experience, Attitude, and Perceived Barriers Toward Research Among Ophthalmology Residents in Saudi Arabia: A National Cross-Sectional Study
    Al Saeed, Ali A.
    AlEnezi, Saad H.
    Aljindan, Mohanna
    Alwadani, Fahad
    Al Owaifeer, Adi Mohammed
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 16 : 265 - 272
  • [46] Desire to delay the first childbirth among young, married women in India: a cross-sectional study based on national survey data
    Ibarra-Nava, Ismael
    Choudhry, Vikas
    Agardh, Anette
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [47] Long-term symptoms and function after war-related lower limb amputation: A national cross-sectional study
    Esfandiari, Elham
    Yavari, Amir
    Karimi, Amir
    Masoumi, Mehdi
    Soroush, Mohammadreza
    Saeedi, Hassan
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2018, 52 (05) : 348 - 351
  • [48] Work related indicators of midwives' job satisfaction and the modifying effect of sense of coherence. A national cross-sectional study in Sweden
    Hansson, Malin
    Eriksson, Monica
    MIDWIFERY, 2025, 142
  • [49] Cross-sectional study of the association between cataract surgery and age-related macular degeneration in the era of phacoemulsification in the national health and nutrition examination survey 2005-2008
    Zhu, Zhuoting
    Wang, Wei
    Liao, Huan
    Keel, Stuart
    Zhang, Jian
    He, Mingguang
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [50] Relationship between dietary sodium and sugar intake: A cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2016
    Gress, Todd W.
    Mansoor, Kanaan
    Rayyan, Yaser M.
    Khthir, Rodhan A.
    Tayyem, Reema F.
    Tzamaloukas, Antonios H.
    Abraham, Nader G.
    Shapiro, Joseph I.
    Khitan, Zeid J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2020, 22 (09): : 1694 - 1702