Characteristics of Rotary Sprinkler Water Distribution under Dynamic Water Pressure

被引:4
作者
Li, Na [1 ]
Liu, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Ningshan [1 ]
Yang, Qiliang [1 ]
Liang, Jiaping [1 ]
Li, Jianian [1 ]
Yu, Liming [1 ]
Liu, Xiaogang [1 ]
Zhang, Wenqian [3 ]
机构
[1] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Modern Agr Engn, Kunming 650500, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Tarim Univ, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Aral 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Water Resources & Architectural Engn, Yangling 712100, Xianyang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
dynamic water pressure; peak time; orthogonal test; circular rotator sprinkler; coefficient of uniformity; average intensity; SPRAY-PLATE SPRINKLERS; IRRIGATION UNIFORMITY; PERFORMANCE; DROP; RUNOFF;
D O I
10.3390/horticulturae8090804
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
In order to explore water distribution in sprinkler irrigation systems under dynamic water pressure, an irrigation test was conducted in a sprinkler irrigation system equipped with the Hunter MP2000 full circular rotator ray sprinkler under "trapezoidal" waveform pressure to explore the influencing factors such as basic water pressure, dynamic pressure period, and the sprinkler combination spacing. The result shows that the basic pressure, sprinkler combination spacing, and their interaction significantly affected the coefficient of variation, average intensity, and coefficient of uniformity. The normalized comprehensive evaluation indexes were selected as the measurement standards. The optimal factor combination was found to be the basic pressure of 250 kPa, the dynamic pressure period of 200 s, and the sprinkler combination spacing of 6 m, and the corresponding evaluation index values were 0.08, 10.54 mm/h, and 93.20%, respectively. The uniformity coefficient was increased by 6.54% compared with the constant pressure of the same flow rate. Compared with the constant pressure of the same flow rate, the sprinkler area and the average intensity increased by 39.67% and decreased by 8.62% when the basic pressure was 250 kPa and the dynamic pressure period was 200 s. The average uniformity coefficient increased by 11.76% at the combined spacing of 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, and 8.0 m. The results provide a theoretical basis for sprinkler irrigation decisions under dynamic pressure.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [朱兴业 Zhu Xingye], 2018, [农业机械学报, Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery], V49, P145
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, 2761232011 GBT CHIN
  • [3] Soil-plant system response to pulsed drip irrigation and salinity:: Bell pepper case study
    Assouline, S.
    Moller, M.
    Cohen, S.
    Ben-Hur, M.
    Grava, A.
    Narkis, K.
    Silber, A.
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2006, 70 (05) : 1556 - 1568
  • [4] Branscheid V.O., 1968, Trans. ASAE, V11, P0801, DOI [10.13031/2013, DOI 10.13031/2013]
  • [5] Chen XiangWei Chen XiangWei, 2013, International Agricultural Engineering Journal, V22, P31
  • [6] Drop and energy characteristics of a rotating spray-plate sprinkler
    DeBoer, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (03) : 137 - 146
  • [7] Dogan E., 2003, EVALUATION COLLECTOR, P269, DOI [10.13031/2013.13986, DOI 10.13031/2013.13986]
  • [8] Wetting front advance patterns and water losses by deep percolation under the root zone as influenced by pulsed drip irrigation
    Elmaloglou, S.
    Diamantopoulos, E.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2007, 90 (1-2) : 160 - 163
  • [9] Comparison of fixed and rotating spray plate sprinklers
    Faci, JM
    Salvador, R
    Playán, E
    Sourell, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2001, 127 (04) : 224 - 233
  • [10] Fu BoYang Fu BoYang, 2019, Water Saving Irrigation, P26