Soil quality index: Exploring options for a comprehensive assessment of land use impacts in LCA

被引:83
作者
De laurentiis, Valeria [1 ]
Secchi, Michela [1 ]
Bos, Ulrike [2 ]
Horn, Rafael [2 ]
Laurent, Alexis [3 ]
Sala, Sereneila [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
[2] Univ Stuttgart, Insitute Acoust & Bldg Phys, Dept Life Cycle Engn, Wankelstr 5, D-70563 Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Dept Management Engn, Div Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment QSA, Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Land occupation; Land transformation; Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA); Soil quality index; Normalisation; Regionalisation; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.238
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Impacts associated with land use are increasingly recognized as important aspects to consider when conducting Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Across the existing models accounting for land use activities in life cycle impact assessment, a balance is yet to be found between complexity and comprehensiveness on one hand, and applicability on the other hand. This work builds on the LANd use indicator value CAlculation (LANCA (R)) model, assessing the impacts of land use activities on five soil properties, and aims at developing an aggregated index to improve its applicability. First a statistical analysis is conducted, leading to the shortlisting of the four most significant soil quality indicators. Then two options for aggregating the selected indicators are presented: the soil quality index (5121), based on linear aggregation, and the normalisation based soil quality index (NSQI), where the aggregation process involves normalisation integrated into the characterisation step. Country-specific and global average characterisation factors (CFs) are calculated for 57 land use types considering both land occupation and land transformation interventions with the two suggested approaches. The two indices present similar ranking of land use types but the relative contribution of the separate indicators to the aggregated index varies according to the approach adopted. The differences between the aggregation approaches suggested are discussed, together with the limitations related to both the LANCA (R) model and the aggregation approaches. This work represents a first step towards the widespread application of a comprehensive and robust land use model at midpoint level in LCA. Finally, a number of recommendations for the future development of the LANCA (R) model and of the related soil quality models are provided. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 74
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING SY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, APPL STAT HDB TECHNI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, AGR HDB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EUR24571EN ECJRC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper 180
[6]  
[Anonymous], PUBLICATION SERIES R
[7]  
Beck T., 2010, LANCA Land Use Indicator Value Calculation in Life Cycle Assessment
[8]   Accounting for the impact of agricultural land use practices on soil organic carbon stock and yield under the area of protection natural resources - Illustrated for Flanders [J].
Boone, Lieselot ;
Alvarenga, Rodrigo A. F. ;
Van Linden, Veerle ;
Roldan-Ruiz, Isabel ;
Vandecasteele, Bart ;
De Meester, Steven ;
Muylle, Hilde ;
Dewulf, Jo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 203 :521-529
[9]  
Bos U., 2016, LANCA Characterization Factors for Life Cycle Impact Assessment
[10]   Global characterisation factors to assess land use impacts on biotic production [J].
Brandao, Miguel ;
Mila i Canals, Llorenc .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (06) :1243-1252