Quantitative easing and bank lending: Evidence from Japan

被引:37
作者
Bowman, David [1 ]
Cai, Fang [1 ]
Davies, Sally [1 ]
Kamin, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Reserve Syst, Div Int Finance, Washington, DC 20551 USA
关键词
Quantitative easing; Japan; Bank lending; Unconventional monetary policy; Central bank; Credit; PANEL-DATA; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jimonfin.2015.05.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Prior to the recent global financial crisis, one of the most prominent examples of unconventional monetary stimulus was Japan's "quantitative easing policy" (QEP). Most analysts agree that the QEP did not succeed in stimulating aggregate demand sufficiently to overcome persistent deflation. However, it remains unclear whether the QEP simply provided little stimulus, or whether its positive effects were overwhelmed by the contractionary forces in Japan's post-bubble economy. In the spirit of Kashyap and Stein (2000) and Hosono (2006), this paper uses bank-level data from 2000 to 2009 to examine the effectiveness in promoting bank lending of a key element of the QEP, the Bank of Japan's injections of liquidity into the interbank market. We identify a robust, positive, and statistically significant effect of bank liquidity positions on lending, especially for weaker banks, suggesting that the expansion of reserves associated with the QEP boosted the flow of credit. However, the overall size of that boost was probably quite small. First, the estimated response of lending to liquidity positions in our regressions is small. Second, although the BOJ's reserve injections boosted bank liquidity significantly, much of the effect was offset as banks reduced their lending to each other. Finally, the effect of liquidity on lending appears to have held only during the initial years of the QEP, when the banking system was at its weakest; by 2005, even before the QEP was abandoned, the relationship between liquidity and lending had evaporated. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 30
页数:16
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Monetary and Economic Studies
[2]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[3]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOVER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :29-51
[4]  
BERNANKE BS, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P901
[5]   Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models [J].
Blundell, R ;
Bond, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 87 (01) :115-143
[6]   LARGE SAMPLE PROPERTIES OF GENERALIZED-METHOD OF MOMENTS ESTIMATORS [J].
HANSEN, LP .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (04) :1029-1054
[7]   The transmission mechanism of monetary policy in Japan: Evidence from banks' balance [J].
Hosono, Kaoru .
JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIES, 2006, 20 (03) :380-405
[8]   What do a million observations on banks say about the transmission of monetary policy? [J].
Kashyap, AK ;
Stein, JC .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (03) :407-428
[9]  
Kimura T., 2003, BANK INT SETTLEMENTS, P276
[10]   Quantitative easing and Japanese bank equity values [J].
Kobayashi, Takeshi ;
Spiegel, Mark M. ;
Yamori, Nobuyoshi .
JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIES, 2006, 20 (04) :699-721