The statistical evaluation and comparison of ADMS-Urban model for the prediction of nitrogen dioxide with air quality monitoring network

被引:18
作者
Dedele, Audrius [1 ]
Miskinyte, Aukse [1 ]
机构
[1] Vytautas Magnus Univ, Dept Environm Sci, LT-44404 Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
Air pollution; Nitrogen dioxide; Monitoring; Dispersion modelling; Statistics; DISPERSION MODEL; POLLUTANT DISPERSION; OXIDATIVE STRESS; EXPOSURE; INFLAMMATION; PERFORMANCE; CANYONS; SCALE; NO2;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-015-4810-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In many countries, road traffic is one of the main sources of air pollution associated with adverse effects on human health and environment. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is considered to be a measure of traffic-related air pollution, with concentrations tending to be higher near highways, along busy roads, and in the city centers, and the exceedances are mainly observed at measurement stations located close to traffic. In order to assess the air quality in the city and the air pollution impact on public health, air quality models are used. However, firstly, before the model can be used for these purposes, it is important to evaluate the accuracy of the dispersion modelling as one of the most widely used method. The monitoring and dispersion modelling are two components of air quality monitoring system (AQMS), in which statistical comparison was made in this research. The evaluation of the Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System (ADMS-Urban) was made by comparing monthly modelled NO2 concentrations with the data of continuous air quality monitoring stations in Kaunas city. The statistical measures of model performance were calculated for annual and monthly concentrations of NO2 for each monitoring station site. The spatial analysis was made using geographic information systems (GIS). The calculation of statistical parameters indicated a good ADMS-Urban model performance for the prediction of NO2. The results of this study showed that the agreement of modelled values and observations was better for traffic monitoring stations compared to the background and residential stations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DEFRA PHASE 2 URBAN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 102011 EEA
[3]  
Batterman S. A., 2010, ENV HLTH, V9, P1
[4]   Evaluation of roadway Gaussian plume models with large-scale measurement campaigns [J].
Briant, R. ;
Seigneur, C. ;
Gadrat, M. ;
Bugajny, C. .
GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 6 (02) :445-456
[5]   Use and validation of ADMS-Urban in contrasting urban and industrial locations [J].
Carruthers, DJ ;
Edmunds, HA ;
Lester, AE ;
McHugh, CA ;
Singles, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2000, 14 (1-6) :364-374
[6]  
CERC, 2011, ADMS URB US GUID VER, P324
[7]   Air quality model performance evaluation [J].
Chang, JC ;
Hanna, SR .
METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2004, 87 (1-3) :167-196
[8]  
Debry E., 2009, GEOPH RES ABSTR
[9]   Estimation of inter-seasonal differences in NO2 concentrations using a dispersion ADMS-Urban model and measurements [J].
Dedele, Audrius ;
Miskinyte, Aukse .
AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2015, 8 (01) :123-133
[10]  
DEFRA, 2010, EV PERF AIR QUAL MOD